OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Mateusz Konieczny's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by Mateusz Konieczny

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
5085121 Mateusz Konieczny

domy

5085118 Mateusz Konieczny

dom

5084446 Mateusz Konieczny

way/1027419576/history has building = foundations

so well, it is not a building at all? Just foundations due to building being unfinished/destroyed?
If it is being contructed then building=construction may fit better
if it is not - then maybe man_made=foundation would be better so it will not get confused for a building?

5084448 Mateusz Konieczny

way/1046445363/history has building = foundations

so well, it is not a building at all? Just foundations due to building being unfinished/destroyed?
If it is being contructed then building=construction may fit better
if it is not - then maybe man_made=foundation would be better so it will not get confused for a building?

5084447 Mateusz Konieczny

way/1105585540/history has building = foundations

so well, it is not a building at all? Just foundations due to building being unfinished/destroyed?
If it is being contructed then building=construction may fit better
if it is not - then maybe man_made=foundation would be better so it will not get confused for a building?

5083483 Mateusz Konieczny

node/2386544424/history

Would it be fine to retag this object to shop=appliance or is shop=white_goods describing something else?

4478580 Mateusz Konieczny

way/929369228/history has access:foot = destination

Would using foot access tag (see foot=* ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/

5071273 Mateusz Konieczny

way/1086961893/history has shop = metaphysical

shop=metaphysical ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=esoteric or shop=new_age ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful? Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?

5085060 Mateusz Konieczny

way/1037401338/history has roof:type = pyramidal

Maybe roof:shape=pyramidal was intended here?

See roof:shape=*

5084995 Mateusz Konieczny

way/877454219/history has natural = stream

what was meant by natural=stream? Is using it instead (or in addition to) waterway=stream intentional here?