Hello! node/3529893442/history has shop = textiles that was added in this edit
shop=textiles ? Is shop=fabric describing this shop well? Is it intentional that shop=textiles, was used not shop=fabric? How it differs from it?

node/10761688451/history

has shop = cartonage that was added in this edit
shop=cartonage ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

way/68894847/history has shop = education

shop=education ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

way/1383198334/history has barrier = fencer

Is there fence here?

if not - what barrier=fencer actually means?

See barrier=fence

way/1323962474/history has barrier = fencer

Is there fence here?

if not - what barrier=fencer actually means?

See barrier=fence

way/88720285/history has shop = agricultural_machine

Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See shop=agrarian

Or maybe this shop value should be documented at OSM Wiki?

way/541908643/history has lanes = -1

what you wanted to express by using lanes=-1 tag?

way/1259166980/history has maxspeed:source = sign

is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See osm.wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see maxspeed:type=*

name=AVM Aquarium Center
node/1220014959

shop=pet_supply ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=pet ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful? Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?