node/12999944142/history - are pedestrians really banned from walking there?

there is access=agricultural tag without foot tag

maybe it should be changed to
motor_vehicle=agricultural
if it applies only to motor vehicles

or vehicle=agricultural if it is for vehicles in general (it is already marked as accessible to cyclists, bicycle= overrides more general access tags)

maybe access tagging here is just altogether wrong?

Les Dunes
node/811792922/history

is it really amenity=restaurant and shop=yes at the same time?

node/2558504040/history

is it really amenity=vending_machine and shop=tobacco at the same time?

赤羽越後屋
node/2558151881/history

is it really amenity=vending_machine and shop=supermarket at the same time?

Süßmost-Automat;Hofladen
node/2411787804/history

is it really amenity=vending_machine and shop=beverages at the same time?

Rucahue
node/1067115508/history

is it really amenity=restaurant and shop=supermarket at the same time?

way/1209186938/history has roof:levels = hipped

Maybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?

See roof:shape=*

node/6150166452/history - amenity=bank combined with cuisine= is quite suspicious. What is going on here?

node/1953597035/history - amenity=bank combined with cuisine= is quite suspicious. What is going on here?

way/540227582/history is tagged as building = proposed

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.