Please, read and follow osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Is your editor not providing a way to describe edits?
Or not making clear that it is needed?

Te obszary już nie istnieją, prawda?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=868717#p868717

way/585528955/history - co miałeś na myśli przez footway=yes?

fixed!

Pamiętasz gdzie to dyskutowane było?

Can you look at note/3295130 and answer it?

Please, read and follow osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please, read and follow osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please note that tree species go into species tag - not into name tag.

Is Go Map !! not providing ability to mark species? Why you use name for trees which have no names but are of specific species?

proszę, nie rób takich testów

tak, te dane się zapisują

Though on the hand this wild waste dump is still existing - even if no new waste is supposedly being added

OK, I am trying to subscribe but I have not got reply after submitting confirmation email.

I will see in the evening has it arrived. If it will not - would you be fine with tagging mailing list or https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ?

Please, mention real data source. Claimed source in this edits is clearly not the real one - it is a blatant import, not tracing of buildings.

Is it https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl import? Have you actually reviewed imported data, as required by budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl import process?

It seems not really active... Maybe tagging mailing list would be better?

The problem here is that

foot=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)

is invalidly formed

foot:conditional=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)

would be the correct form.

Problem here is that time-dependent conditional access tags are nearly unsupported.

So
foot=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)
is both invalid and unsupported by navigation apps, while
foot=yes
foot:conditional=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)
is just unsupported but at least is a valid tagging (even if misused in this case)

Zerkniesz na note/3290455 ?

way/145171626/history - do you know what you wanted to express with bridge_type=metal surface=concrete?

That it is walkway out of concrete on bridge which structure is out of metal?

Note that name should not contain descriptive name such as "Tree"

that is expressed by marking it as tree with natural=tree tag

Can you look at note/3290210 ?

Thanks for the reply! It should be really easy to change it into other value if that would be an improvement (if you do not know how to do this, I can help)

In such case "surface=none" still makes no sense, as there is surface.

Maybe surface=gravel or surface=track_ballast or surface=no_special_covering or something would be better?

Is "Some neighborhoods in this city are too dangerous to transit normally, therefore we the Venezuelan mappers have decided add access restriction tags on the streets of certain areas to protect the safety of navigation apps users" the reason for such edit?

It seems like a case of osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Incorrect_tagging_for_the_renderer though I understand tricky situation.

But, can you link where this edit was discussed? And note that invalidly formed access tag is unlikely to be processed.