Mateusz Konieczny's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 30818937 | over 3 years ago | Zerkniesz na note/3258540 ? |
| 95067610 | over 3 years ago | Zerkniesz na note/3262695 ? |
| 123178570 | over 3 years ago | thanks, fixed |
| 53136467 | over 3 years ago | Skończyli budowę? note/3228242 tak twierdzi |
| 123118722 | over 3 years ago | Skąd informacja że pumptrack (!) way/221974430 jest dostępny dla wózków inwalidzkich? How way/221974430 pumptrack is wheelchair accessible? AFAIK pumptracks are inherently inaccessible to wheelchairs. |
| 118643209 | over 3 years ago | access=private oznacza "zakaz wstępu" nie "właścielem jest konkretna osoba" Jest wiele przypadków iż teren jest prywatny a wejść można |
| 118643209 | over 3 years ago | > jeżeli droga polna nie jest wyznaczona geodezyjnie i prowadzi wyłącznie przez jedno pole uprawne, które ma również jakiś dostęp do innej drogi, to daje private Czemu? Według mojej wiedzy po takiej drodze można legalnie chodzić |
| 118643209 | over 3 years ago | (i dzięki za poprawę tamtej!) |
| 118643209 | over 3 years ago | Też w tej okolicy - way/1041496542/history na pewno ma całkowity zakaz wjazdu i wstępu? |
| 118643209 | over 3 years ago | Skąd highway=residential na way/229323057 ? Czy zdjęcia lotnicze są tam aktualne? Bo nijak nie wynika z nich by to highway=reseidential było |
| 115379894 | over 3 years ago | though it seems that v39.0-alpha1 is also not tagged in repo, which may confuse my parser. |
| 115379894 | over 3 years ago | This is using custom SC version, right? Is "StreetComplete 39.0-alpha" some custom version formatting? (I ask as I am trying to make statistics about quests and StreetComplete 39.0-alpha version string is unusual - though I also see for example changeset/115427614 using it, so maybe it is not divergence of your fork?) |
| 46607758 | over 3 years ago | Czym jest ten obiekt: way/478717963/history ? Murkiem? Płotem? |
| 123063191 | over 3 years ago | triggered by https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/discussions/4178 |
| 123065332 | over 3 years ago | I would consider uploading image to Wikimedia Commons and linking using wikimedia_commons=* This will it make it more usable due to a clear copyright status |
| 122926217 | over 3 years ago | re note/2251490 This error was misleading, see https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8885 What was meant here is that this gate node should be part of the way, not a floating node I fixed it |
| 122632581 | over 3 years ago | @SomeoneElse Is DWG planning to revert edits done as part of that import? |
| 122632581 | over 3 years ago | Note that this import utterly ignored feedback. See for example https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2022-June/006879.html |
| 121645224 | over 3 years ago | OK, now I am no longer confused after changeset/123021086 removed amenity=bank Thanks for mapping and I wish you a good luck! |
| 121645224 | over 3 years ago | way/432365021 is mapped as currently containing bank - is it true? (I got PM that both seemed to describe bank as gone and asking me to not modify things, I am confused) |