Hello! node/8189283221/history has shop = Vivero that was added in this edit
shop=Vivero ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

would it be fine to remove amenity=office as office= is present already?

would it be fine to remove amenity=office as office= is present already?

Hello! node/3989020876/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see office=*

Hello! node/4100642408/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see office=*

Hello! node/11188277256/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see office=*

Hello! node/6323407526/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see office=*

Hello! node/10132873379/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see office=*

created note/5094528 then

thanks for a reply!

a, way/327967095/history się w sumie pojawił już wcześniej a tu była tylko kosmetyczna zmiana wartości

dzwoniłem, telefon działa

Hello! node/12616606834/history has building:name = Cedro Negro that was added in this edit
Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside such as museum or shop, then having separate objects for point of interest and building would be better idea, museum may have own area or node (see also osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

If it is an inscription then it should use inscription=*

If that is not a building name - what was expressed by this tagging?

what is the source and license of this data?

jaki jest powód wycofania changeset/167329990 ?

"Sources: " can you link those sources?

If change was discussed and supported by local community then main issue is not present.

(though linking to discussion in changeset description or changeset tags or changeset discussion is a good idea for mass edits)

Reverting changesets: 175899791 175899758 175899739 175899688 175899572 175899638

Reverting changesets: 175914871 175914648 175914437 175913390

https://revert.osmz.ru/11905

warto dodać że DK 19 nie ma tu do dzisiaj