> I don't see any advantage in that.

it becomes usable by data consumers using OSM data

in the current state it may be as well not tagged at all

Wait, it is a deeper problem.

This is way so ot simply should not have this tag.

But it is also city-wide landuse=residential, while not area inside is residential (includes say cemetery)

Hello!

You used
type=multipolygone
on way/334507333/history

Have you maybe meant
type=multipolygon
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
type=boundary0
on way/1125018234/history

Have you maybe meant
type=boundary
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
climbing:grade:uiaa=-6
on node/11806560958/history

Have you maybe meant
climbing:grade:uiaa=6-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade 2
on way/70708306/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade2
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello! node/2071575161/history has shop = petrol that was added in this edit
is it a fuel station? See amenity=fuel

Or is it a shop selling botled petrol? Maybe as a fuel?

Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade1-2
on way/1214582370/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade1
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello! node/11072292818/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit
shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=beverages ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?

Hello! node/7099206616/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit
shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=beverages ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?

Hello! node/13233757537/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit
shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=beverages ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?

Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade2c
on way/371586337/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade2
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello! node/12330308511/history has shop = mini_super that was added in this edit
Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see shop=convenience .

Hello!

You used
network=rwnlw
on relation/8211185/history

Have you maybe meant
network=rwn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=4;6
on way/640686207/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=5
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=4;6
on way/141325669/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=5
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=2;4
on way/336546159/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=3
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=-2
on way/83144426/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=2-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=-1
on way/242584686/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=1-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?

Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=-3
on way/389082178/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=3-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?