Hello! node/242960109/history has barrier = step_over that was added in this edit
What kind of barrier is here?

See barrier=* for a typical values

Is it maybe a stepover stile? See barrier=stile

Thanks for a fix!

> ref by itself is mysterious, so why not name it better?

no idea who had this idea, maybe it makes more sense fot UK native speakers?
Either way, it has got established and widely used. BTW, there are sillier ones, see osm.wiki/Counterintuitive_keys_and_values

the last sentence was completely mistaken, ironically I created that page on wiki

sorry

(I had prepared comment that I copy pasted and it was outdated - sorry for a confusion!)

Hello! node/9159329435/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12601657140/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12720552750/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/294888995/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12753128543/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/4337906534/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12396508913/history has bicycle:repair = assisted_self_service that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12818107221/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/10778007350/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/4708870499/history has bicycle:repair = mobile that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/12766468551/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/8032622099/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/6724941682/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/10665000594/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/705459010/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*

Hello! node/10690475024/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See bicycle:repair=* and service:bicycle:repair=*