Mateusz Konieczny's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 155859801 | 25 days ago | Hello! node/12141303764/history has shop = propangus that was added in this edit
|
| 148391364 | 25 days ago | Hello! node/11704499761/history has shop = tiler that was added in this edit
There are several tagging for various tile-related things. Is it really distinct from them? How it differs from:
Maybe one of this options fits well and can be used? |
| 175355619 | 25 days ago | way/1195200907/history - na tym odcinku plac budowy jest zaznaczony to budowa chyba też? |
| 145183216 | 25 days ago | Hello! way/1231655166/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit
|
| 122375009 | 25 days ago | Hello! way/1069609063/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit
|
| 147343657 | 25 days ago | Hello! node/11611625158/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit
|
| 148626119 | 25 days ago | Hello! node/11729930341/history has surface = kies that was added in this edit
|
| 167323216 | 25 days ago | then healthcare=alternative alone should be enough, without shop= tag (or maybe they sell also some snake oil there?) |
| 147554944 | 25 days ago | > Deleting something that someone thought valuable doesn't improve the map. in many cases it does, copyright violation cleanup being a clear case DWG routinely reverts edits that someone considered useful |
| 147554944 | 25 days ago | "What matters is value to the end-user" not really, see osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer "that can only be judged by the end-user" maybe, but that is irrelevant when deciding on what is the correct thing to map |
| 13994242 | 25 days ago | razed railways without traces or such section are ineligible for being mapped in OSM |
| 147554944 | 25 days ago | value or not does not really matter, what matter is data accuracy |
| 13994242 | 25 days ago | (especially as note reporter that raised this was kind of suspect at best and malicious troll at worst, and obviously someone with OSM experience - but as far as that section goes they seemed right about railway) |
| 13994242 | 25 days ago | no problem, I can do deletion myself I was just asking is it as obvious as it seems (and in theory they could preserve tracks in basement or something) |
| 147554944 | 25 days ago | rendering is not really relevant here the question is rather is that section still having visible remains or not |
| 162669878 | 25 days ago | Hello! way/1343298397/history has building:part = 2 that was added in this edit
|
| 13994242 | 25 days ago | way/152762828 - at least section going through building can be deleted, right? |
| 147554944 | 25 days ago | note/5077809 - are there any visible remains at section where motorway is now located? |
| 134557696 | 25 days ago | way/1159287438 - what kind of obvious signs remain at that location? maybe this can be added as tag on that way? wanted to close note/5077802 but it is not obvious what, if any, remains are present there |
| 174568846 | 25 days ago | what kind of traces, if any, remain in way/54178637/history#map=19/43.071824/-76.165397&layers=N area for that railway=abandoned ? related to note/5077798 |