Proszę przeczytaj i zastosuj się do osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Have you posted to imports@openstreetmap.org mailing list as required?

Note that undiscussed imports can be reverted by anyone, at any time, without warning or further reason to do so (just "not discussed import" is good enough)

osm.wiki/w/index.php?search=hair%20removal finds beauty=*

shop=beauty beauty=hair_removal ?

if value for shop was set, then amenity=fixme may be removed

I will do it

is there any trace remaining of way/764899747 nowadays? Or at time of mapping?

is it mapped solely based on old maps?

is there any trace remaining of way/764899747 nowadays? Or at time of mapping?

is it mapped solely based on old maps?

"please note that railway=razed is consumed by openrailwaymap and should thus not be deleted despite on-ground rule"

that is incorrect tagging for renderer, see osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Incorrect_tagging_for_the_renderer

"there is ample evidence that the feature existed, on ground and on PD-maps " it is utterly irrelevant if it is not existing anymore

also, are you sure that cyclists are banned there?

are you sure that paths where you set name=cruising are actually having such name?

Can you take look at note/4811471 ?

Can you take look at note/4811472 ?

can you take look at note/4811473 ?

Can you take look at note/4811474 ?

can you take a look at note/4811475 ?

can you take look at note/4811306 ?

Thanks!

I like when changeset discussion goes well :)

have you discussed this unreviewed import with community?

Are you aware of osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments ?

See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-import-in-algeria/104175/6

dzięki wielkie za poprawki!

shop=chemist ?

wysłałem W z błaganiem o przeczytanie