Can you look at note/1480240 ?

Can you look at note/1480240 ?

Can you look at note/1480240 ?

1) it is a bad idea

2) it is unusual idea, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/parcel=yes

3) you made 0 edits: please do not engage in tag inventing ideas in changeset comments

wikimedia_commons_1 solution is also fine for me

BTW, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/restrict-wikimedia-commons-urls-as-image-tag-values/2271 is related discussion (though I commented here for a different reason)

(you can post on that new official forum using OSM account)

O, to super: tylko nie sprawdzaj na Goggle Maps i w podobnych stronach (sprawdzanie strony sklepu/kawiarni/itp jest OK)

Dzięki za przeglądanie notek! Staram się poprawiać więcej niż zgłaszam ale nie nadążam na tyle by Kraków był czysty więc miło jak ktoś inny tez poprzerabia :)

node/9975290963 - I would say that just wikimedia_commons link is fine! No need to add image tag

yes

I guess it depends on how common you expect for anyone to support semicolon delimited tagging here

At least in my opinion support for one single-value image and dubious support for extra images is much better than no support at all

Though I guess one may be in position of expecting semicolon support as bare minimum (even if that is really unusual and I would expect this tag to be single valued)

Though main problem with Automated Edits code of conduct it is that it is really strict and vast majority of automated edits violates it, while people are refusing to drop unnecessary parts.

(nevertheless, as far as I see: this edit has not passed osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct )

though I agree that this tag is broken and we would benefit from purging it

> That tag itself des not add much value in itself

This is untrue, it allows to identify roads very likely to be less important

Are there any visible remain of former tramway?

How one may detect by visiting that location that tramway used to be there?

note: your image link is broken

which image you wanted to link?

remive image = C:\Users\doncukm\Downloads\kontejnery

C:\Users\doncukm\Downloads\kontejnery lonks image on your drive and is NOT available to other people

Is the lake still there?

Jakie jest źródło tych poprawek? Wizyta na miejscu czy coś innego?

What was wrong with fairways you deleted?

As StreetComplete explains while editing: surface:note is supposed to contain description explaining surfaces impossible to tag more clearly.

For example one valid explanation is "asphalt on Southern lane, concrete in the Northern lane"