Poprawiam to właśnie, ale zauważ że w way/180687947/history zepsułeś link do Wikipedii

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/pl:Kopalnia%20W%C4%99gla%20Kamiennego%20Julian opisuje to miejsce, a https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/pl:Kopalnia%20W%C4%99gla%20Kamiennego%20Bobrek-Piekary%20w%20likwidacji nie istnieje

Why landuse=commercial was added to way/48779854/history ?

Please, answer: have you checked copyright status before the import?

Note that data on incompatible licenses must be removed from OpenStreetMap

Where this import is documented?

Are you aware of osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Note that not discussed imports may be reverted by anyone.

(if that import is dicussed and documented - please, link its documentation page in every changeset)

Also, see osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct (this seems to be reviewing each element, but you should be aware about this rules)

Jakie są podstawy zmapowania way/812637608#map=15/50.0675/19.9094 ?

Jest to jakiś projekt który można na serio traktować?

Please, read osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Jak dodajesz te budynki i adresy - to kontrolujesz ich stan i przeglądasz by wyłapać buble, które w danych urzędowych się trafiają?

Hello! What you wanted to express by using surface=trail?

That this way is unpaved?

way/670180056

Hello! What you wanted to express by using surface=trail?

That this ways are unpaved?

way/103758993

Hello! What you wanted to express by using surface=trail?

That this ways are unpaved?

A to super - bo się przestraszyłem na podstawie opisu edycji

So in summary: barrier=property_boundary was mapped from aerials and survey and represents unspecific physical barrier (may be wall, hedge, fence, row of bollards etc).

There are some mistakes like going though building, but it represents mistakes/simplifications.

Would you be OK with reverting my edits, retagging this barrier=property_boundary to barrier=yes (standard tag for representing unspecific physical barrier) and deleting parts that are clearly not existing?

(I can explain how I reached my initial conclusions but it is likely unimportant and uninterestesting)

Chwila moment. Czy dodałeś access=private tylko na podstawie moje uwagi że access=private wygląda na prawdopodobny w tych ofródkach działkowych?

Moja uwaga była "

ogrodzone są, do typowego ROD nie ma wejścia, bramy zaznaczone

Czy to teren prywatny?

Nie brakuje tu access=private by zaznaczyć to?" note/2515480

Czyli nie było to wystarczające by dodać access=private

A jeśl miałeś inne informacje - to czemu o nich nie wspomniałeś tylko dałeś " aktualizacja danych według uwag użytkowników "?

I deleted solely barrier=property_boundary that represented guessed or imported boundaries between properties, not a physical barriers mappable in OSM (some were going for example though middle of a building).

I mapped some barriers clearly visible in Bing (maybe there is a better aerial imagery available)

"we sent you an email in order to clarify any doubts."

You also must fulfill requirements of https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines that require documenting
"any non-standard tools and data sources used, and their usage
conditions" on OSM Wiki page of your organized edit.

Also, anyway I have not yet got info (in any form) about usage conditions of UNIS, specifically whatever it is licensed in way that allows using it for distruticing traced imagery under ODBL.

Can you mention that UNIS at
osm.wiki/Unite_Maps_Initiative/UN_Mappers ?

It would be probably better to use more descriptive term in changeset
comments, but I created osm.wiki/UNIS for
now (as some changesets were already made using that term).

Also, what are licensing terms of that imagery? Are there limitations
on tracing and distributing data? It also should be mentioned on that
page, preferably with quote from relevant contract (it is typical that
people claim "source is OK" only to discover that they meant "I copied
from publicly available Google Maps").

Also https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
require documenting
"any non-standard tools and data sources used, and their usage
conditions"

See also osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/deimport_landuse_in_central_Africa,_mostly_East_Congo for documentation of planned revert

Note that in such case, especially given lack of response - it is OK to revert such unexplained deletions if they were done without a good reason.

Note osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines