> Putin is not the owner of building and he has denied this accusation.

It is not relevant at all. If such name is used then it is taggable.

> Nobody cares what slang name is used for this place

Slang names are also taggable in OSM.

name:lang are the official names - nope, it is for a common name - that may or may match an official name

official_name:lang is for official names

> However, even in this case, you are using unverifiable data from, sorry, questionable source.

Even if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putin's_Palace is based on lies (as far as I know, it is not) then it is still English name used for that building. Even if it is actually an opulent orphanage or something.

Deleted tree restored, sorry - fixed in changeset/98165800#map=19/44.41931/38.20513

I added back name:en and name:pl only, as currently these are common names to refer to that building, I admit that I am unsure about name and name:ru so I have not added them back

We have name, official_name and loc_name

name has the most common name (with some bias toward official/non-slang ones), but in cases where official name is basically unused or does not exist at all, it is fine to put common name (that is not officially recognized) into name tag (or name:pl name:en tag)

Can you look at note/2512468 ?

Why you deleted all tags from relation/12217206 while describing it as "Reverted vandalism "

1) It is perfectly fine to add non-oficial names.

2) Privacy rules are a bit different for publicly known people, especially where known so widely that they result in name changes

Also, have you discussed mass adding of that tag, as required by osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct&oldid=846228 (linking state of that page at time of this edit).

Are you still using this building:place tag?

Jeśli cała linia po pozycja parkowania, to w takim razie node/4139332447 jest do skasowania, prawda?

To że działki są podzielone prawnie to jeszcze nic nie oznacza.

Aczkolwiek jeśli budynki budują to wskazuje że coś z tego pewnie będzie.

way/722971729/history - czy ta cała linia to parking_position?

Nie lepiej to w punkcie otagować?

way/759163781#map=19/50.32132/19.04496 - skąd wiemy że ten projekt warto traktować jako realny?

Nie tworzymy takich kategorii. Do czego potrzebujesz tych relacji? Mogę pomóc w zrobieniu tego do czego ich używałeś.

osm.wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories

Czy way/139571490 jest przejezdny czy nieprzejezdny?

Jeśli trwają prace a jest przejezdny to construction=minor byłoby lepsze

Jeśli jest nieprzejezdny to lepiej otagować jako railway=construction construction=rail

Jak podnieśli ograniczenie to trzeba też zmienić source:maxspeed na sign z PL:urban

way/216690349/history i inne

(znalezione dzięki Osmose - http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.07388&lon=19.99588&item=xxxx&level=1&tags=&fixable=&issue_uuid=6a7b9d8d-0219-83e4-4611-32e2c3ba80f2 )

Zekniesz na note/2508277 ?

Czyli wszędzie ma mniej niż 2 metry szerokości? Tak dla potwierdzenia przed skasowaniem błędnego tagu bicycle.

Może miejscami łapie się na dopuszczenie z ponad 2m szerokości i ponad 50 na drodze?

ops, tutaj "geometrii, zdjęcie bublowatego covered=yes " nie było

> There are another imports in Finland which you can revert, if you have eager to make reverts.

Can you link this other imports? If they have at least the same problem as this one and are feasible to revert then I will do this.

----

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2012-January/001210.html

This imports thread merely announces then-upcoming change of NLS license.

----

If anyone will link

- thread on Finnish forum or mailing lists with agreement that this import of
man_made=tar_kiln, mml:class=45400, man_made=tower etc is/was/will be desirable

- thread on imports mailing list about specifically this import

Then I can create OSM Wiki documentation page about this import