OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
63071623 about 7 years ago

Hopefully revert rate will be not higher than with other tagging for renderer.

Good point about OSM website, I added "autolinking brand:wikipedia and other *:wikipedia tags on OSM website" to my (already way too long) TODO list.

46513295 over 7 years ago

Can you look at note/1545511 ?

46507755 over 7 years ago

I received a private message from author that information=add was added tor technical reasons and that it can be removed.

58854389 over 7 years ago

Are you sure that quotes are part of the name of this travel agency?

31750515 over 7 years ago

I know that it is an old edit - but please, do NOT add anything based on Google maps.

62864935 over 7 years ago

I am curious - what is the point of tagging pluscode? It is just a different format of specifying longitude and latitude.

And as such always can be computed from location, or turned into more readable location format.

62924861 over 7 years ago

Is it intentional that shop=vacant was kept for node/3927503222#map=19/51.08827/6.59332&layers=N ?

62741020 over 7 years ago

What was the reason for moving tags from relation to ways?

58824054 over 7 years ago

Can you look at note/1535685 ?

62721042 over 7 years ago

According to google translate it is only describing brand:wikidata tag, not proposing any specific import.

From what I see at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2017-July/thread.html#85125 this message had no followup discussion.

62721042 over 7 years ago

"Can you point me to this discussion?" is necessary only if you want me to revert this edit.

If you prefer to revert this edit on your own then it is not necessary.

62721042 over 7 years ago

Sorry! Can you point me to this discussion?

I tried contacting original author in changeset/58260742 and there was no reply.

Changeset also contained no link to mechanical edit documentation or link to a discussion, so I thought that it is an undiscussed mechanical edit.

In this case - feel free to revert this edit (preferably with link to discussion edit description to avoid this confusion in a future).

As this is a fresh edit, it should be fairly easy to revert it.

61401087 over 7 years ago

It is nice to hear that cleanup is planned.

Can you link to documentation of this import?

53689019 over 7 years ago

What is the source of this edit? What is the source of data for this 1693 peaks? Is it OK to add it into OSM?

44625597 over 7 years ago

@Torbat_streets What is the meaning of "surface=asphalt no 1"?

11202041 over 7 years ago

Jakie jest znaczenie tagu _SITE_CODE_ ?

61401087 over 7 years ago

Is this mechanical edit following osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
?

If not - are you planning to fix it (and revert it, if not accepted by OSM comminity)?

54806298 over 7 years ago

I changed seasonal=spring-autumn to seasonal=spring;summer;autumn at node/5292858128/history and node/2489190758/history (objects edited in this changeset)

Can you link objects where I "changed the keys from spring and summer to spring, summer and autumn"

54806298 over 7 years ago

I will look at it, it was not supposed to happen.

I am really sorry.

21154024 over 7 years ago

Zerkniesz na note/1531410#map=19/49.56810/22.40084&layers=N ?