note: it was not surveyed, it is a remote edit based on a name

note: it was not surveyed, it is a remote edit based on a name

Hej czemu mamy i node/1701715726/history#map=19/51.11890/17.04204 i node/1701715734/history - z tego co widzę tam jest jeden przystanek.

Czy way/137276375/history rzeczywiście powinien być otagowany jako przydrożna kapliczka (historic=wayside_shrine)?

Can you look at note/1273136 ?

It has fixme and according to note "needs review".

It also has "source:waterway" tag but is not tagged as waterway.

It also seems to be duplicate of way/81923872#map=12/49.6825/17.5928

"it's here only for historical/offical reasons" - so it is no longer existing, right?

Are you still planning to do something with way/173041959 ?

Byłoby lepiej gdyby były osobne komunikaty dla poszczególnych błędów. Czy kod tego narzędzia jest na githubie? Wysłałbym PR.

Czym jest way/481044690 ? Chętnie pomogę w odpowiednim zaznaczeniu tego obiektu ale nie wiem czy on jest.

Can you look at note/1269722 ?

Can you look at note/1269733 ?

Is it intentional to use power=line rather than power=minor_line for way/429960823/history ?

Is it intentional to use power=line rather than power=minor_line for way/429960823/history ?

In my town I tag such places as amenity=parking - I feel that it fits "a facility used by the public, customers, or other authorised users for parking motor vehicles" ( amenity=parking ).

(if you are curious why I commented here - there was huge and a bit pointless discussion on tagging mailing list about this object starting with https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-January/034727.html )

See also note/1266900#map=18/-8.65152/118.22119&layers=N

Do you know what is the purpose of way/223853253/history ? Is it a parking?

"source=knowledge"

Is it copied from other maps?

Can you look at note/1262879 ?

Skasowałem node/2949796764 i inne - miały nazwę TEST więc uznałęm to za edycję testową i wycofałem.