OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
95774447 over 4 years ago

It's part of conflation with the pre-existing data. I don't remember particularly about the station, but isn't that building the station itself?

104699786 over 4 years ago

Thanks for helping to improve CT! Just please don't delete building parts.

102754566 over 4 years ago

If you think that it is better on the building outline then you can go ahead and do the change.
also.. conflation plugin for JOSM should handle that pretty easy.

102754566 over 4 years ago

When there are multiple addresses for one building they have to be on nodes and this way it looks more consistent (and easier to spot problems).
But if people want to later put them on the building polygon or entrance node they can do that.

100710888 over 4 years ago

Hi MapleExplorer,
thanks for your edits, but did you get a permission from the author of the map to use it for adding features to OSM?

Also, what happened to the paths? many have unrealistically sharp angles or are not connected to anything else.

102150599 over 4 years ago

Hi bevalim,
Thanks for adding all that useful information. Would you mind including source of the data in your changesets. When it comes to copyright we like to avoid potential future problems.
Thanks

101515557 almost 5 years ago

Hey Kevin, historic=ruins is more for significant historic structures like castles. In this case abandoned:man_made=watermill is more appropriate.
Also "Mill Ruins" is too generic, do they have names?

101286280 almost 5 years ago

Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM.

However, I have to ask you:
1. Please do not delete existing objects. If they need updating, then edit their shape or tags.
2. Please don't create overlapping areas. See leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for how to map correctly.
3. Do not tag for <what ever software you are using>. If the area is marsh then leave it as march and don't change it to grass.

6076393 almost 5 years ago

Hi, I am working on fixing rivers in Georgia. What the purpose of these small stream fragments?
e.g. way/82011473
I assume they were meant to indicate occasional flow. I am merging them and labeling as intermittent=yes.
Is that correct?

101006386 almost 5 years ago

I don't think that it makes sense to have isolated 0.5 mile road stretches across CT labeled as trunk roads. Would you want to be routed somewhere just because your navigation wanted to save 3 seconds on "higher" class road?
Also this doesn't really fit trunk description as high performance or high importance road similar to interstate highway. Typically, "a relatively high-speed divided road (at least 40 MPH with a barrier or median separating each direction of traffic".

100660473 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
thanks for contributing. I wanted to ask if you know that those driveways have no trespassing sign? If not then they should not be labeled as private as they can be used by delivery vehicles or visitors. Correct tagging is access=destination + ownership=private.

On the second note, please do not delete existing objects. The correct way is to add access tag to indicate whether they can be used or not.

100521527 almost 5 years ago

You're right. I got carried away by the editing too much and then it was too late to split it into several changesets.
Will remember for the future.

100449595 almost 5 years ago

Hello ZoSoSF, thanks for contributing to OSM. I have to though give you comments on few things that I noticed in your edits:

1) please do not remove valid tags like water=lake : way/908517598
2) do not delete valid structures such as building and replace them with low quality hand traces
3) your imagery is most likely not aligned and you shifted all objects to wrong position
4) please do not enter random number values into name tag: way/913324542, way/913324543
5) golf=green and golf=fairway polygons should not overlap

I had to revert some of your changes to fix these errors

100013224 almost 5 years ago

Just check that this is officially recognized as village and not census region. (I the past I had extensive argument about this since some people hate when census areas are in admin levels)
If it is village then admin_level should be 9 (8 are towns)
osm.wiki/United_States_admin_level

100000000 almost 5 years ago

First! .. oh man not again :(

Congratz!

83910377 almost 5 years ago

This one was probably supposed to be attached to something

node/7432177407

99069205 almost 5 years ago

It seems this would be more appropriate tag: man_made=survey_point

98989685 almost 5 years ago

Hey David, what is going on with West Rock Park? Now the main section is split into 3 parts. Some outer parts are overlapping probably causing it not to render. And as far as I know there is no West Rock Ridge New Haven Park.

98856657 almost 5 years ago

Sorry that was me. It happened when I was cleaning touristic attractions and I probably though this was there because someone just wanted to have a text rendered on the map.

98723518 almost 5 years ago

No problem. I have fixed the road, check if the private stretch is as you intended.