OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
160258577 about 1 year ago

questa modifica ha qualche problema, in particolare il nome non è dell'edificio, ma dell'intera area scolastica, ed è già presente, annullo

150492680 about 1 year ago

grazie a te, non ricordo come sia successo sinceramente, forse ho confuso due percorsi vicini, ho provveduto a ripristinare footway

159355532 about 1 year ago

duplicate of existing place, added with the wrong tags too

changeset/159587506

157211767 about 1 year ago

tvb

156877922 about 1 year ago

Sorry, forgot to fix it, almost correct, if you can do it for me, just thu off, or I'll do it at a later time, thanks

156555459 over 1 year ago

reverted, as this isn't a turn restriction but a no access

156503901 over 1 year ago

Anpis is the acroniym for "Area naturale protetta di interesse locale", so the name could be shorted to ANPIS del Torrente Terzolle, but the official name I think should stay the long one (also thanks a lot for the fix)

156503901 over 1 year ago

I found this line without tags, then looking through history I saw it lost the relation status previously, so I restored it, I didn't see the other duplicate one, so one can just go, but I don't understand how,on the problem with the inners, it seems a lot of years ago they were added during an import, I assume they can be removed or changed

155462753 over 1 year ago

ok, va segnato quindi come strada pedonale, non footway, pensavo fosse solo una ztl, e sarebbe dovuta esser mappata come tale, ma se è strada pedonale è diverso, ma sicuro non un percorso

151630644 over 1 year ago

Ehilà, questa modifica non ha apportato alcuna modifica alla mappa, hai bisogno di aiuto?

151287365 over 1 year ago

Thanks, fixed it

149772070 over 1 year ago

I've updated the tags to better reflect what I've learned from this discussion, it's still not perfect. I still don't think a more detailed discussion should take place here, should we open a proposal in osm? there are already many in the discussion of the wiki page

149772070 over 1 year ago

I tought about it a while, and by what I understood from the consensus on the wiki is that the museum is not free, if you want to visit it you need to pay a fee, the fact that you have to walk through the garden to reach it doesn't mean it's free from a fee. it still has it. the only way to make it clearer would be to invent a new value for the tag, fee=connected (or similar), that means that it's the same, not an additional one. we might discuss it somewhere better maybe?

146773852 almost 2 years ago

I understand, I won't touch this anymore and I won't try again to do relationships anymore

146773852 almost 2 years ago

I see, how do I fix it? I just selected all the segments that were part of the park and saw that one of them was without the relationship tag, I tought it was deleted by error, and put it back like in all the other segments.
If you can revert it it would be apreciated, as I don't know how to

146773852 almost 2 years ago

the issues were there before, I just readded some missing relationships in the lines, but they are still to fix, as they were before, I don't have the tools to fix this, as for me it fails with "too many nodes on line"

139485002 over 2 years ago

I can't save as that, I found hgv:conditional=permit, so I saved it like this

139485002 over 2 years ago

thanks, I'll fix it

139485002 over 2 years ago

how else would you add that hgvs can access that road only with a permit?

132577596 almost 3 years ago

Ciao, ho avuto un problema con l'editor e mi è crashato, se puoi annullare questo changeset mi faresti un piacere, che non son riuscito a finire quello che volevo fare e non son nemmeno riuscito ad annullare queste modifiche. Quei link son quelli che stavo seguendo e i problemi ero in parte riuscito a risolverli nell'edit perso