This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="apartments"]["addr:housenumber"][!"addr:state"];

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 26 objects
"addr:country=US" | 730 objects
"addr:state" | 731 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 15 objects
"source=*" | 648 objects

Thanks for your feedback! I've corrected this in Changeset: 153823937 to "shelter=separate" ("shelter=seperate" as it was originally was a typo)

Happy mapping!

Hi! Looks like this changeset created an unnecessary multipolygon relation for this building (iD likes to do that sometimes when ways are split - it's an easy mistake to make unknowingly) so I've deleted that and recreated the building way in Changeset: 153726081. Happy mapping!

Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I saw that you requested a review of this changeset, and I noticed a couple of minor tagging errors:

"access=no" should be changed to "access=private" and the "private=*" tags should be removed. (The "*" is used in discussions and documentation as a placeholder to represent another value, and isn't meant to be entered literally)

Unless restrictions on bicycle use are explicitly signed at the location (and I don't see any on the Mapillary footage of this location from 2020, when the gate was open) I would also remove the "foot=*" and "bicycle=*" tags.

If the gate is normally locked, you could also add "locked=yes" to the "barrier=gate" node to make is clear that this is not open or accessible to the public.

Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!

The elements added in this changeset have been re-tagged in Changeset: 153677717 to follow more-current tagging conventions.

This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Modified:
"amenity=vending_machine" -> "amenity=ticket_validator"
"operator=TfWM" -> "operator:short=TfWM"
"shelter=7201" -> "ref=7201" (1 instance not caught by Changeset: 153675345)

Added:
"operator=Transport for West Midlands"
"operator:wikidata=Q7985947"
"payment:swift_card=yes"
I also added documentation for this Swift card subkey on the OSM Wiki: payment:*=*#Public_transport

Removed:
"category=Interchange|Station|Stop"
"mode=Bus|Metro"
"name=*"
"naptan=*"
"payment=no"
"postal_code=*"
"public_transport_ticket=Swift Card"
"source=TfWM"
"top_up=yes"
"vending=public_transport_tickets"

Unaffedted:
"check_date=*"

Thanks for cleaning these up! I also appreciate that you left detailed and helpful comments on the reverted changesets. :)

For anyone wanting to review this changeset, I'd recommend using the following tool, because OSMCha struggles with large bboxes:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153673904

This changeset (Part 2) follows up on Changeset: 153565207 (Part 1).
changeset/153565207

The elements in this Changeset: 153565207 (Part 1) have been further edited in Changeset: 153568560 (Part 2). Please leave any feedback for this changeset there, rather than here.
changeset/153568560

This changeset introduced a geometry error for Way: 107188991 which prevented it from rendering. I have fixed this in Changeset: 153519745.

That makes sense to me - I've added "lit=yes" to these features in Changeset: 153510716. Happy mapping!

Thanks for catching that and bringing it to my attention - I have further updated this part of N 137th St (now Way: 1296454128 and Way: 1064471020) in Changeset: 153219914.

Let me know if there's any further problems I've introduced. Much appreciated and happy mapping!

Hi - I just wanted to chime in and add my support for these types of tagging fixes. Genus/species/taxon tagging is an absolute mess, and changes like this ("species=Tilia sp." -> "genus=Tilia") help to clean that up. Thanks!

Many thanks - surveys of stop details like `ref`s are really helpful when mapping public transportation routes, especially in locations like this where there's two identically-named stops very close on opposite sides of the road. Much appreciated. Happy mapping! :)

Hi! I noticed that this changeset doesn't seem to include any actual tag or geometry changes, but the involved elements underwent a version bump.

To better help local mappers understand this validation effort, could you clarify what process or tools are being used to make these changes? Thanks.

Cheers - happy mapping! :)

Thanks for adding these!

Hi - this is not an informal crossing, as it is at an intersection and there are sidewalk extensions on either end.

Please review the tagging guidance on the Wiki:
crossing=informal
informal=yes

I have fixed this error in Changeset: 152693268

Hi - the correct value of `crossing:markings` for this crossing is `zebra:paired`, not `zebra`.

Please review the tagging guidance on the Wiki:
crossing:markings=*

I have fixed this error in Changeset: 152690920

Hi - as I mentioned in the comments on your Changeset: 152648594 - it is incorrect to classify these crossings as informal.

Please review the guidance on the Wiki, which clearly states that `crossing=informal` (and `informal=yes`) are only for highways that are not formally established.

crossing=informal
informal=yes