Can you check your edits here regarding oneway roads? I can see you've removed the roundabout, but the way the roads are set doesn't really make sense as it stands, for example way/139529913. There's no up-to-date imagery showing the new layout, so your input would be appreciated once again.

Hi, from where have you added this (and other) housenames? From surveying (seeing in person) or some other source or map?

Thanks for fixing up lots of these!

I do not understand - how can you delete 120 footways and corridors by mistake?

炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑炼化火坑

Reverted in changeset/175050655 as I didn't recieve a response.

I've re-added amenity=parking to these courtyards as the spaces are visible on aerial imagery - unless you have a source showing that they have been removed/repurposed?

Hi, on all your edits I've had to remove aerialway=chair_lift as this can only be applied to chair lifts that have completed construction and are open. If you want these proposed lifts to appear on skimaps.org/openskimap.org, it's up to the developers there to support the correct 'lifecycle prefixes' - proposed:aerialway=chair_lift and construction:aerialway=chair_lift. This edit also removed some tags from a bus route in Salt Lake City, which have now been restored. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Hi, I've corrected the changes you just made - for cameras mounted on poles you should have added the tag camera:mount=pole instead of changing the existing camera:type=fixed tag. Also it was not correct to click 'Tag as not the same operator' for the cameras in the Home Depot and Lowe's car parks. I have corrected these also. If you have any questions feel free to ask, and happy mapping!

This changeset incorrectly connected elements on different layers together, for example the Brightline flyover over Blue Diamond road, where nonexistent railway=crossing nodes were also added. I've tried to correct all of these, but it's hard to verify due to the size and variety of changes made here.

Thank you for refining the fire pit

Chinese Oil Refinery

disabled=yes seems like a strange way to tag a nonexistant railway halt (node/1214318902)? Maybe historic:railway=halt? (if it should even be on OSM). Likewise the railway marked as abandoned despite no trace on aerial imagery?

Approximately how long ago was this?

Removed - vandalism

There is no pedestrian area covering this roundabout... why have you added one?

Can I suggest that this kind of data is not normally present in OSM - for example school and medical catchment area boundaries due to the fact they are not published publicly and therefore are not verifiable by other contributors if they change or are removed. Additionally, the tag landuse=residential was incorrect. Can I suggest that you create this area as an overlay in another service for example https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/, rather than importing this data directly into OSM? In my opinion as this catchment area is for internal use, it's not appropriate for being in OSM. Umap will provide the same functionality, if not better for what you are trying to do in providing information for your patients.

Removed in changeset/174584516 following discussion on OSM world discord

This footway through the car park (way/1450144598) doesn't look real... it would have been better just to connect this other footway (way/1450144597) to the end of the parking aisle...

Please write a short description in every changeset to help other contributors understand what you've added or changed - 'ssss' isn't very helpful, thanks