I got rate limited if anything is broken (it definitely is) the final changeset is getting uploaded in 30 minutes

For what reason have you deleted all these internal walkways and corridors?

Why?

Hi, just to let you know I have updated/removed some of the tags you added at Al Makhtoum Airport - you should only use aeroway=runway, aeroway=terminal and building=* tags once the airport is actually complete and ready for operations. I've changed them to use lifecycle prefixes like proposed:aeroway=runway and construction:building=airport_terminal

Hi, could you check the housenumbers that you added here? It doesn't really make sense for the terrace to be numbered 18 -> 10 -> 14... Thanks

Thank you, I dedicate my work to my loyal fans, all (0) 235 of them

For your information, this changeset was reverted by changeset/173801587

See this overpass query, there's about 1000 that were created around Pontypridd and Caerphilly https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ehz

There seems to be a lot of untagged duplicate nodes that were created by this changeset, for example along way/1423713656
I don't know how widespread this is because I don't know how to overpass for untagged nodes...

Has this business not been renamed to BlackSea Technologies? (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/maritime-applied-physics-corporation_thanks-for-being-with-us-through-the-journey-activity-7341812119610322946-T33U) / the mapcorp website now redirects to https://www.blacksea.tech/ which lists 1850 Frankfurst Avenue as its address. Also, it is not allowed to use Google Maps as a source for adding information to OpenStreetMap.

Hi, I also had to remove these farmland areas because they were added within an existing farmland area.

Hi, I had to remove the wood you added in Welham Green as it duplicated an existing wood (Bush Wood). If you need any help, feel free to ask

I won't pretend to understand how UPRNs work but thanks for this - it's great to get all these postcodes in!

Wow! The landuse looks so much nicer now!

Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately, I had to revert your three changesets because a lot of roads had been dragged into impossible shapes and were crossing each other. I've re-added your intended changes, marking the roads as opened and the street names/address. Would you be able to confirm that all the housenumbers currently displayed are actually wrong? It looks like they are the plot numbers used by the developer and not the final housenumbers? If they are innacurate I will remove them all. Your insight would be appreciated, thanks.

name= should not be used for housenumbers, please use addr:housenumber=1-7 to indicate the range of addresses on a terrace

Hi, is there a specific reason for why you are dividing up residential landuse in this way? I can't work out the logic behind what is divided up and what isn't, and there's no tags differentiating each area.

For your information, I used this area as an example in a forum post I created (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/individual-residential-landuse-for-each-house-or-street-good-or-bad/136497) among other examples to seek opinions from the wider community about whether this kind of mapping style is desired or not. The general consensus so far is that mapping physical barriers such as fences is ok, but splitting up landuse according to cadastral parcels is not necessary. It would be interesting to hear your point of view. Thanks in advance.

Happy 10,000th changeset! 🎉

Is ALDI really still here? This recent changeset changeset/172048221 moved the supermarket to a new site to the East, between Rockingham Road and Gores Lane

Hi, I've gone through and capitalised the housenames that you surveyed. But thank you for adding them!