OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
38280899 over 9 years ago

The source:maxspeed applies to the ways but putting it on every node is overkill.

38746473 over 9 years ago

I think i've found a fix for the moment.

Having it as the inner of the multipolygon and also having riverbank tag confused things.

I've taken off the riverbank and it's rendering properly again.

38746473 over 9 years ago

I've been trying to figure out why some of the islands are flooded and I think i've narrowed it down to this changeset.
Just wondering if you need a hand with fixing them?

38662049 over 9 years ago

If there is an issue with osmand not finding a properly tagged address, i'd raise an issue on their tracker so they can check it out.
https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues

38662049 over 9 years ago

Don't worry about the rollback too much. I've already corrected most of them manually including the Vermont and Vermont south admin boundaries.
They should be re-rendered properly shortly.

I'm happy to leave the address data you've added, i'm just taking off the building=yes where is not being applied to a building outline.

38662049 over 9 years ago

If your software requires tagging school ovals, parks and suburbs as buildings, then that is a fault in the software, not a justification for false mapping.

38662049 over 9 years ago

Please stop tagging everything as building=yes.

38663305 over 9 years ago

I've removed the building=yes tag from some of these. This tag applies to actual building outlines only, not to entire properties that have a building on them.

See building=*

36731395 almost 10 years ago

Has the road been moved? because if so you should probably move the lake and power lines it now runs across.

37621491 almost 10 years ago

Just an FYI, a couple of pieces of the Hunter River relation were removed at some point which broke the relation.

Not sure where or when or how it happened, but these comments made me think they could be related.

25850434 almost 10 years ago

I didn't even realise i'd touched this :-)

I've been following your posts on the list and happy for you to improve these.

36311838 almost 10 years ago

The tunnel doesn't intersect with the surface roads except where the ramps surface and are already marked.
It does pass directly below the surface roads though. I'd class the junction errors as false positives.
As for the layer, yes the tunnel is below the surface so -2 seems appropriate.

36373129 almost 10 years ago

I've been doing a few random cleanups based on the new imagery. Just happened to notice the name appearing at a bunch of the junctions.

36373129 almost 10 years ago

:-) No dramas. Was going to offer to help but looks like you've got it under control.

36373129 almost 10 years ago

Guess you didn't mean to name all these junctions "Edensor Road"?

36373129 almost 10 years ago

Guess you didn't mean to name all these junctions "Edensor Road"?

35780497 about 10 years ago

Oops, last comment was meant to be "logic" not login :-)

35780497 about 10 years ago

Not sure i agree with changing the roads inside the ferry terminal. After all if we follow that login then the ferry itself should be highway=primary since it's the only road into the state. Of course, that would also be outright wrong.

35098872 about 10 years ago

was meant to be highway=traffic_signals and messed up so didn't autocomplete.
fixed now.

21641314 over 10 years ago

Thanks, can't have been concentrating as i've used tree_row hundreds of times :-)