We leren bij :-)
Maar ik ben het alleszins met je eens dat popinjay heel dicht in de buurt komt, tagging lijkt me dus correct.

Waarom precies vind je popinjay incorrect?

The wikidata value does not refer to the brand "Kringwinkel", but to the concept of a charity shop. In my opinion, this tagging is not really correct.

Bedankt om dit aan te passen!

I also had another look at it, and given the principle that the restriction goes from the sign to the next intersection, I believe it should indeed be mapped from the Rue Chafour to the Rue des Fusillés. You agree?

Thanks for the clarification!

:-)

Dit was een duplicaat, is ondertussen aangepast: node/5723073929

You could tag this as shop=e-cigarette shop=e-cigarette

Thanks!

Is this also a oneway street for bicycles? If not, please add a "oneway:bicycle=no" tag. That way, routing for bicycles can take this into account.

Keep on mapping!

Nice!

Dear Ilona,

It's nice to see you are mapping maximum height based on Mapillary pictures! Can I just make one remark: it seems logical to me that the maxheight (usually) only applies to a tunnel, not to the road leading up to that tunnel. Is there a reason you are also tagging these roads before/after the tunnel with maxheight tags?

Keep on mapping!

oneway=yes
oneway:bicycle=no

Je kan als tags de combinatie oneway=yes (eenrichtingsverkeer) en oneway:bicycle=no (fietsers mogen in beide richtingen) gebruiken.

Probably a good idea to contact the original mapper and explain what you did.

juist, mij vandaag ook aan mispakt...

Nice first edit, keep mapping!

OsmAnd was alleszins helemaal mee toen we op reis vertrokken, top!

;-)