4. Someone even suggested it should be "Luk Ngau Peak". This shows there is no commonly used variation.

1. You are not allowed to decide directly from Wikipedia. This is copyright infringement
2. It has been marked with `{{Unreferenced}}`
3. They haven't clearly distinguish whether this is an actually used English name, or only Cantonese phonetics.

4. `addr:region=Hong Kong` is not correct either.

3. eg is south of Tin Shui Wai station TIn Sui Wai? Can be no, because they are covered in Hung Shui Kiu and Ping Shan OZP respectively. But postal address and common use might be yes. Same for Fung Ka Wai east of Tin Tsz Road.

This is obviously wrong when TKO is more than that.

1. `place=town` is an abstract concept that shouldn't have a defined area
2. New Town or OZP is for planning purpose only, and is copyrighted.
3. It is debatable whether they are `boundary=administartive`. Postal address is a different matter.

Moved to `name:yue-Latn=`

Moved to `name:yue-Latn=`

5. Please don't make up English name by transliteration or romanization. `name:*=` is for those in common use by the public. Use `old_name:yue-Latn`.

There's no `natural=pass`. In OSM. `=saddle` and `mountain_pass=yes` are distinguished clearly. The former is a low point compared to the surroundings on a mountain. The latter is the highest point of a road going through a mountain. There can be a mountain pass without saddle, and vice versa. They often do not coincident.

3. Please use more descriptive changeset comments, not repeating the same vague sentence
4. Please group similar changes into one changeset to be uploaded. This is excessive fragmentation flooding the feed.

1. Please don't cite random "online" source. `name=` is the common name in use by the public currently, not what you or someone or history think it should be.
2. This was considered an `old_name=` by previous discussions. Please raise this issue again.

It's not needed to have address-only names, unless it has special styling. (eg 700 Nathan; Nathan 700, Seven Hundred Nathan, etc)

Ok, I think you two are thinking about different parts. Let me see....

Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=`. That's for actual proper names only. Use `description:zh=`.

What's wrong with this one? There's clearly something there.

1. Please don't cite random "online" source. `name=` is the common name in use by the public currently, not what you or someone or history think it should be.
2. This was considered an `old_name=` by previous discussions. Please raise this issue again.

Please don't add `ele=` to `=ridge`. This doesn't make sense.

1. Another example is Chek Lap Kok being included in Tung Chung

(Btw if you are using your own instance, you could adjust how it works)