N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

There appears to be 2 summits here.

Note: Please try to find the most common name used by the public. `name=` is not about the "correct" name by some criteria, or according to someone.

1. If there is no other name, this is marginally acceptable.
2. Please move it to `old_name=`, instead of removing.

@hkpeakname @HKHikerhang Both of you please don't quote from official maps, except perhaps those older than 50 years.
Caution on trigonometric station not being the highest point is very important to remember.

See way/875635210

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

4. Don't attach objects to irrelevant features.

3. Split your changesets to upload related items, not everything in the entire world.

1. Please check `alt_name=`. No brackets in `name=` please. This is not a descriptor label. Proper names only.
2. If names are wrong. correct them. Don't delete the high point itself.

1. `=townhall` is not for a "hall".
2. `information=office` is for tourist info for the entire place.

1. `allotments=plot` is for the land assigned to one individual.
2. `=sanitary_dump_station` is for dumping toilet waste directly.

1. Change them, not delete them.
2. Descriptor labels in `description:zh=`, not `name=`.

Please don't use `=peak` if it isn't a high point over the entire surrounding.

Please don't use `=peak` if it isn't a high point over the entire surrounding.