Why is this promoted to `=primary` directly?

Please don't add online-only businsses (or fakes)

I won't accuse everyone adding historical names is the same person without more incriminating evidence. But `old_name=` as usual.

Your one time alone doesn't mean it won't be used, considered, or rediscovered again. Referenced by them, ok? osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F#What_should_I_do_instead?

Please don't delete it directly, as it may still be used in search & rescue. It should be changed to `abandoned:highway=`

Speed limit isn't the same as train speed. The latter is affected by headway, and timetabling. You should only use real speed limits, signposted or codified rules.

Well then the problem is you have deleted the upper level of Chater Garden, and casually snapped the MTR exit to the corner unrealistically. The `=tunnel` section is not represented by the `building=` , and it would be the 1st step to make it routable. If you don't have time, don't want to, or don't know what to do, leave it alone. Don't simply delete things, and flunk it.

Please don't merge different sections blindly. Eg some are `indoor=yes` to be distinguished from `covered=yes`

You should not ask the last user. It's not the one responsible.

This is not sufficient. 8 Waterloo Rd is `=8 Waterloo` . not the same. `=No.8 Clear Water Bay Rd` needs to be discussed.

Please don't add such `name=` which are `addr:street=` + `addr:housenumber=`

There's obviously something there given the `highway=` drawn to the `=peak`

I don't understand what's "disappearing", and you are still creating many more dragged points. Don't upload such mishaps. They do more harm than any good.

Can you explain what you are trying to do? Mass deletions, and dragged points.

This is already added as `proposed:oneway=yes`

I don't know why you need to delete both. Can keep one of them, obviously the older one and more changed one, and the other was a `=restaurant`

Please don't snap unrelated points to other lines. This doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing difficult.

3. Don't create 2 points for different features at the same coordinates

0. Please use meaningful upload comment, not sign with your username
1. Please don't delete then recreate the same feature, especially with less info
2. Please don't delete closed shops directly, as they contain addresses. This makes tracking and updating more difficult, wasting others' effort.

2. There's also imagery offset here. Again don't merely align to one latest imagery.