Kovoschiz's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 163717702 | 9 months ago | Please don't upload personal-use data. This is a live public database. It is considered vandalism. |
| 163642017 | 9 months ago | This doesn't make sense. Either the `entrance=` should be removed, or the `building=` shape should be corrected. The `building=` is correct. In fact, the `=footway` is `indoor=yes` , meaning both are correct. The `=footway` should only be split. |
| 163641244 | 9 months ago | Please don't remove valid info. It needs to be improved as different `building:part=` correctly. |
| 163641198 | 9 months ago | A `=parking_entrance` should not be on the intersecting point between the sidewalk. It should be on the `building=` |
| 163640651 | 9 months ago | This is obviously visible on imagery. The road continues on the podium. Please don't fix for validators. |
| 163639733 | 9 months ago | Please don't make groundless assumptions. The road passes under the tower. It already has `tunnel=building_passage` . It's not wrong. |
| 163616572 | 9 months ago | I don't mean "fork" is a diverge. Sai Sha Rd westbound is special. To be precise, you have to travel through a section of the MOS Bypass first. Only the eastbound follows the old bypassed alignment directly. |
| 163616572 | 9 months ago | As I said, let's not continue arguing which one is the fork of the other one. The junction is a fork, where a road continues on the other side. It's not only a slip road connecting with an interchange. |
| 163616572 | 9 months ago | No, I have never said anything about history. Please don't make guesses and assumptions.
|
| 163616572 | 9 months ago | 2. MOS Rd has a fork with MOS Bypass. It continues, not being an entry or exit. Bypasses are usually considered forks, not using `_link`=* on the bypassed road. |
| 163616572 | 9 months ago | This was already discussed. It will be changed to `=primary` to the Sai Sha devleopment when Sierra Sea has population intake. Lok Wo Sha Ln and Nin Ming Rd doesn't justify a `=primary` yet. |
| 163544439 | 9 months ago | This doesn't translate the actual `name=` . It's already described in `description=` . Please don't add such descriptor labels that aren't proper names. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
| 163501577 | 10 months ago | Please don't make up random translations on your own. There's already the English naming around here. |
| 163501488 | 10 months ago | Please don't use machine translation, especially if you can't even choose Japanese correctly. Your Mandarin didn't even translate "古". |
| 163225639 | 10 months ago | Please don't make literal transliterations. This is not even what the mountain is called. `name=` is a proper name commonly used only. Machine-like translations are not needed. |
| 163424104 | 10 months ago | Please don't change this `disused:railway=` to `railway=crossing` . It isn't functional. No trains travels pass it. |
| 163236442 | 10 months ago | You need to be cautious with recognizing what's a "name". These are usually titles or descriptive label. When you see a webpage, item, link, or document, etc, named that, you should not immediately assume it's a `name=` , especially with these prefixes. Is it "舊羅湖鐵路橋" or "前羅湖鐵路橋"? Is it "Old" (that's the `name=` added before by others), "Former", or your "Preserved"? This can't be agreed on. Adding these prefixes also interferes with proper names with these words, eg Old Town or Old Market can be a proper name.
|
| 163273890 | 10 months ago | 2. Please don't delete properly tagged objects |
| 163273890 | 10 months ago | 1. Please don't directly delete, as they still represent a store space, and may contain an address. This makes tracking and updating difficult.
|
| 162912820 | 10 months ago | Please don't blindly follow suggestions, as they may be incorrect. "Matsukiyo" is used in HK. https://www.matsukiyo.hk/rwd1509/Store/OwnImage/logo-20220711.png https://www.matsukiyo.hk
|