It could be possible to make the westbound right turn and eastbound right turn share the section at the X-shape, but I want to minimize `oneway=alternating`

3. It's quite ambigious to join 2 roads at a crosswalk. This should be avoided. The other reason for connecting the westbound right turn is it travels through the eastbound straight and left. The eastbound right turn makes a standard turn at the intersection. This should be modeled as a simple "T" shape, not drawing fake turning paths.

On the contrary, the westbound left and straight or right turns are separated. I don't know know what you are doing.

2. Please don't draw a separate line when there is no raised physical separation. The eastbound left turn isn't separated by an island.

Can you explain how is this more realistic and simple?

2. Please check before you add duplicates. Don't remove objects with more info than yours.

Please don't delete them as they represent a shop space, and may contain addresses or other info. This makes tracking them difficult, and more effort to add the next tenant. Change it to a plain "point".

The westbound right turn has to pass through eastbound directly in reverse. It doesn't turn across it.

Please don't draw curved turning paths. Keep them straight unless there is really a curved island. This is the same for intersection street corners. The corner radius should not be taken into account.

1. `building:levels=` is counted in total vertically, so this would be `building:levels=29` + `building:min_level=4`
2. `building:flats=` is the total number in the entire building, not per floor
3. `access=permissive` means allowed, not by permission. This would be `=private`

1. Please don't delete then recreate the same thing with less info
2. Please use informative upload comments, not something as useless as repeating your name

2. Also be careful about `access=` vs `motor_vehicle=`

"Except for permit" shouldn't use `=permit` in HK. That's ambiguous, and was defined for "routinely granted" ones in other country.

2. Please use OpenHIstoricalMap for these. OSM is for the reality now.

Please don't use `place=village` etc. They are already rendered with `=locality` , and on eg Historic Places with `*:place=`

醫院管理局大樓不是醫院，不應有 `=hospital`

1. Please don;t add projects that are only plans now as `=construction`
2. Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , which is for proper name only osm.wiki/Proposal:Subject#Examples

2. `layer=` should not be added to an `amenity=` . `=-1` is only a relative order, doesn't mean it's underground or lower than ground. `parking=underground` already expresses enough meaning.

1. Please notice this object is for the whole phase including both the mall and estate, which have different identities. `name=` is for the proper name only. Don't add descriptive labels, with commas. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
2. `layer=` should

Please don't merge casually. You are removing info without transferring them.