This is actually for the larger `boundary=administrative` it is naming. There is another item for this location.

Please at least add `bicycle=yes` back to them. And I find `*cn_=yes` more proper and informative.

You haven't fixed it. At most, there is a `route=hiking` . No `route=mtb` .

Your other edits changeset/141012355 and changeset/141012355 hasn't been adding them to it.

You could coordinate on Discord to let everyone to see, not that it is crowded. Or use the wiki page. osm.wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Routes#專營巴士_Franchised_buses

Eg changeset/140987678
And `route=bicycle` removed on `highway=` without belonging such a `type=route`. This can be valid if the class of `*cn=yes` wasn't determined yet, https://osmcha.org/changesets/140798528
Fundamentally `*cn=yes` is acceptable. `ref=` and `network=` aren't removed from roads with `route=road` created.

For completeness, `*cn_ref=` is valid when they belong to a `=node_network`

There is complain in changeset/140987678

This user has been mass removing `*cn=yes` in cases where the `route=bicycle` doesn't exist.

Have you discussed this before? The situation is `surface:colour=` means the `*cn=yes` . as such it can only have one `network=` , making `network=` usable. These `route=bicycle` are not really existing, and I don't agree with `network:type=basic_network`.

Please don't add not yet opened features directly. They should use eg `construction:leisure=swimming_pool` .

Please don't delete it. This is the result of previous flawed edits. It should be fixed up.

`highway=service` + `area=yes` is correct here. The `=station` + `=bus_station` should be moved.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `=construction` already indicates this.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. This confuses whether they are named already. `proposed:name=` hjas already been prepared.

Please don't add fictions restrictions. `=use_sidepath` and `sidewalk=` is enough.

The `=retaining_wall` itself is very short. And there's a large gap here.

This is not true. There is a large slope behind the `=retaining_wall` , which this is trying to capture.
`=cliff` has been widely used for slopes in HK.

1. I'm not the one who added it first
2. What is "the location" ? It's a few hundred metres long. As I said, move it if the position is wrong.
3. Are you sure you can drop down the slope directly from the village to Hong Lam Court?

`destination:ref=` is only used when the outgoing road is immediately that `ref=` . Otherwise the routing towards that is `destination:ref:to=` .