This is not an etymological discussion. `addr:place=` needs to be a village with its own house-number, in lieu of house-number associated with. Housing estates don't have this house-number assigned inside. Quite the opposite, in larger developments with their own streets (eg Meifoo, Whampoa, Taikoo Shing), they are assigned house-numbers on those streets.
Here is a list of housing estates with village house-number currently mapped. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jqH
There are many other with `addr:place=` but not yet tagged with `addr:housenumber=`. You can query for them, and compare other sources.

`addr:parentstreet=` + `addr:street=` is inaccurate, and doesn't solve the issue. An `addr:building=` would be more suitable for a building itself.

This is not the case. `addr:housename=` is same as `addr:housenumber=`, which in HK will be applied to the entire housing estate. Even if you find it misleading, `addr:place=` is for villages with `addr:housenumber=`. In fact, there are housing estates in villages using village house-number, meaning a conflict.

Secondarily, points on opposite directions are aligned to each other.

As I said before, please don't move lines upstream beyond the physical separation. `change:lanes=` is already used here.

Please don't remove the address.

Please don't change `=pedestrian` to `=footway` when it's a emergency or maintenance vehicular access.

Please don't add bracketed descriptor labels in `name=`. That's for proper names only. Use `description:zh=`.

HI, can your team stop removing `highway=footway` + `area=yes`, or at least change them to `area:highway=footway`? For example this one is a wide open sea in front of the mall with a brand statue, so it's natural someone wants to draw it. Can you share what's the validation issue.

Please don't extend turning lanes to sections without physical separation.

Please check the lanes. This is required on top of `change:lanes=`.

Please don't use Taiwan name of Sukiya. HK has no such branding.

Please don't delete the address.

`man_made=chimney` only refers to a vent stack. It is not a replacement for the entire `building=`.

Ok I don't know how integrated the soil, building, and deck is.

2. For the 2nd method, the `type=multipolygon` can then be changed to `type=building` with `part`, and the `outline` included.

1. `addr:place=` is only used for villages with house-numbers.
2. Multipolygon can't have touching sub-areas. You need to either split the shape at the common segments to use it; or not use it by drawing an outline over all 3 sections, and changing them to `building:part=`.

Please don't merge `area:highway=` + `bridge=yes` or `man_made=bridge`.

2. Please don't delete those temporarily closed or in reconstruction.

Please don't move what's already been tagged with `placement=transition` and `change:lanes=`.