Can you explain how water sudden turn towards a hill and flow across it?

What's wrong with it???

Please stop deleting other things that exist.

This is a transliteration name I kept here in case anyone wrongly adds it again. This is not really used.

Please don't remove other names.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

Please don't remove other names.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

There are actually 2 summits here.

1. That one I do not know. Although he cited a book, the user has been reported.
2. Other users have added back other ones themselves. Some have also added names (although I don't pursuit the validity of them much) for others in the areas. They seem ok.
3. What contour lines are you looking at? A `=ridge` doesn't have to be as sharp as visible from aerial. There is eg natural=arete for that. See examples at natural=ridge they don't have to be very recognizable either.

If the name is wrong, correct it. Don't delete other features that exists in reality.

Thanks, but it's better to revert (using JOSM) than add again.

`name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

Thanks, but please don't delete it directly. It still exists in reality. Remove the name only.

Ok thx, I will accept this solution. What I thought is there is already way/897549860 that it may not be helpful to show they belong to it.

There is also an `alt_name=` here. Handling different summits is tricky.

Please explain this. It's not "spam" if it exists.

Do not simply "beautify" things. You have to consider the reality of separation, and functionality of merging and diverging.

Please check `placement=` and `*:lanes=` tagging. There is nothing to fix here.

Also check way/897549860

There is an `alt_name=` so I'm not sure what you want to do.

No brackets in `name=` please. This is a proper name, not printed map descriptor label. Notice the `*_name=`.