1. Can you explain why should `motor_vehicle=no` + `bus=yes` still get `=secondary` instead of `=service`?
2. Please don't mis-appropriate objects https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7159365191
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94428780

Construction is on-going in the area. This may be removed as of now, per unreponsive https://osmcha.org/changesets/95034810. Haven't checked the final plans.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95444379

This was mentioned in osm.wiki/Talk:Key:opening_date unsigned.
I don't suppose we should convert to `proposed:start_date=` and `proposed:end_date=`.

There are 69 `closing_date=` instances. Do you intend to remove all of them? This is in line with not using `start_date` in the case of `opening_date=`.

Especially be careful when it carries other info, such as address.

If the shop is outdated, you should nullify its info (eg by `demolished:*`=*) without removing the point. The restaurant is gone, but the shop space is still there.

Please be the most cautious to not delete a highest-level feature tag as `highway=`. You already broke https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/833114438 in changeset/92812210.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95142808

Connecting roads along a land-use area is a bad style. Either it passes through the park's inside, or it aligns between the park and building (which shouldn't be connected to the park's gates).

changeset/95033692
Already has `addr:street=`

changeset/95033692
way/148784182 already has `addr:street=` (`addr:street:en=`)

Ok so what happened to the left turn slip?

changeset/95033692
This is in the railway station underground. The addressing may be a little more complicated.

changeset/95033692
way/295407286 already has `addr:street=`, and `addr:city=` ( `addr:suburb:zh`)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95033789

changeset/95033692
way/47174645 already has `addr:street=` (`addr:street:en=`)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95033779

changeset/95033692
The `addr:street=` of this, which is obviously not a `=hospital`, can be corrected. changeset/86708735
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95033775

changeset/95033692
way/47117859 already has `addr:street=` ( `addr:street:en=`)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95033767

changeset/95033692
Already has `addr:street=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95033752

changeset/95033692
This should be merged with way/618043395

changeset/95033692
Already has `addr:street=`

changeset/95033692
way/101959040 already has `addr:street:*=`