Should be connected. Not separated.

Should be connected. Not separated.

Should be connected. Not separated.

This is forgetting to connect all vertexes. Should not be separated.

This is forgetting to connect all vertex. Not separated.

There's no error here. Please look at the existing situation before editing.

This is an obvious case of forgetting to connect all vertexes. It should not be reshaped.

Overhanging buildings are common in HK. They should not be assumed as wrong.

They should be connected to each other, not separated

This is not referring to the same structures. It's a large drop shaft as an intake for the Drainage Tunnel below.

1. Please don't fix for validation software. I don't see any problem here. The shape was correct. You deleted it to redraw it inaccruately.
2. You didn't add back the addresses, and the `=house`

Please see discussion changeset/166263341
changeset/166573618

Not to mention the `=stop_area` referencing the `=stop_position` on the road `highway=`

Please don't Fix For Applications. The physical position was correct. Roads have width. Stops can't be inside the roadway. You should report any bugs or limitations to the application developer itself. There's already `bridge=` + `layer=1` for the Flyover, and driving side could be used to solve most matching.

1. You used `=residential` instead of `=construction`
2. Please don't use such terms or project names, as `name=` is for proper names only. This is not what it be called after opening. Don't add bracketed descriptor labels. This is a digital map database, not a someone's printed map.

Please avoid creating `=multipolygon` for a single simple shape. It's inefficient and resource-intensive, unnecessary complication, and not entirely editing-friendly.

Please don't delete addresses. They should be kept.

Please avoid drawing short-term temporary buildings, and detailing inside `landuse=construction` if you don't know the area. The `building=` is already removed.

2,3. Another great example is on the northern terminal of TMCLK. While the main route is supposed to be with Tuen Mun (previously Western) Bypass, the street is gazetted to the Lung Fu Rd roundabout, so it can be seen as a fork. At the same time, Tuen Mun Bypass will continue as a slip road connecting with Lung Mun Rd along the median, but that's not really it's main route.

3.1. It can also be said as constructed due to HZMB, which won't be reflected here. That's geography.
3.2. Again, they merely shows you why you can't exactly use a three-way interchange's layout. Both Quarry Bay and Sai Ying Pun interchanges are mainly influced by turning radius, reducing grade-separation span and distance (considering sloped ramp length as well), limited available land, etc. On the other hand, you could also say WHC and Connaught Rd W flyover route are continous along the median (the spit is simply to connect with the flyover, and still along the median), then it's the main route?
4. You still didn't discuss why those `=primary` can't be `=motorway_link`