OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
163717702 9 months ago

Please don't upload personal-use data. This is a live public database. It is considered vandalism.

163642017 9 months ago

This doesn't make sense. Either the `entrance=` should be removed, or the `building=` shape should be corrected. The `building=` is correct. In fact, the `=footway` is `indoor=yes` , meaning both are correct. The `=footway` should only be split.

163641244 9 months ago

Please don't remove valid info. It needs to be improved as different `building:part=` correctly.

163641198 9 months ago

A `=parking_entrance` should not be on the intersecting point between the sidewalk. It should be on the `building=`

163640651 9 months ago

This is obviously visible on imagery. The road continues on the podium. Please don't fix for validators.

163639733 9 months ago

Please don't make groundless assumptions. The road passes under the tower. It already has `tunnel=building_passage` . It's not wrong.

163616572 9 months ago

I don't mean "fork" is a diverge. Sai Sha Rd westbound is special. To be precise, you have to travel through a section of the MOS Bypass first. Only the eastbound follows the old bypassed alignment directly.

163616572 9 months ago

As I said, let's not continue arguing which one is the fork of the other one. The junction is a fork, where a road continues on the other side. It's not only a slip road connecting with an interchange.

163616572 9 months ago

No, I have never said anything about history. Please don't make guesses and assumptions.
MOS Bypass is forked from it, while it's configured as main route. Let's ignore the order if it's confusing.
The junction is a fork. MOS Rd continues down. So it doesn't need to be be a `highway_link`=*

163616572 9 months ago

2. MOS Rd has a fork with MOS Bypass. It continues, not being an entry or exit. Bypasses are usually considered forks, not using `_link`=* on the bypassed road.

163616572 9 months ago

This was already discussed. It will be changed to `=primary` to the Sai Sha devleopment when Sierra Sea has population intake. Lok Wo Sha Ln and Nin Ming Rd doesn't justify a `=primary` yet.

163544439 9 months ago

This doesn't translate the actual `name=` . It's already described in `description=` . Please don't add such descriptor labels that aren't proper names. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

163501577 10 months ago

Please don't make up random translations on your own. There's already the English naming around here.

163501488 10 months ago

Please don't use machine translation, especially if you can't even choose Japanese correctly. Your Mandarin didn't even translate "古".

163225639 10 months ago

Please don't make literal transliterations. This is not even what the mountain is called. `name=` is a proper name commonly used only. Machine-like translations are not needed.

163424104 10 months ago

Please don't change this `disused:railway=` to `railway=crossing` . It isn't functional. No trains travels pass it.

163236442 10 months ago

You need to be cautious with recognizing what's a "name". These are usually titles or descriptive label. When you see a webpage, item, link, or document, etc, named that, you should not immediately assume it's a `name=` , especially with these prefixes. Is it "舊羅湖鐵路橋" or "前羅湖鐵路橋"? Is it "Old" (that's the `name=` added before by others), "Former", or your "Preserved"? This can't be agreed on. Adding these prefixes also interferes with proper names with these words, eg Old Town or Old Market can be a proper name.
Names should be considered as what will be recorded on nameplates and signs, following the ground truth principle. If the bridge has a plaque, It will be "Lo Wu Bridge" only. Similar to how "Beacon HIll Tunnel" is carved on the previous KCR tunnel, not modified as "Old Beacon Hill Tunnel" etc.
Another perspective to look at this is how `man_made=` is a physical structure similar to `building=` . This bridge deck has only been moved here. It has no other changes. It's still the same "Lo Wu Bridge".

163273890 10 months ago

2. Please don't delete properly tagged objects

163273890 10 months ago

1. Please don't directly delete, as they still represent a store space, and may contain an address. This makes tracking and updating difficult.
2. Please don't delete then create the same feature again. This is meaningless, and obstructs tracking.
3. Please use descriptive upload comments, not signing your name

162912820 10 months ago

Please don't blindly follow suggestions, as they may be incorrect. "Matsukiyo" is used in HK. https://www.matsukiyo.hk/rwd1509/Store/OwnImage/logo-20220711.png https://www.matsukiyo.hk
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HK_KTD_觀塘_Kwun_Tong_APM_mall_shop_Matsukiyo_Store_October_2022_Px3_01.jpg