Please read previous changeset/153239869

Reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong).

Reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong).

Reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong).

Please don't change the entire `building=` area. Create a separate new point inside.

2. And please, more descriptive upload comment, at least and quite enough a general location. Doesn't have to be exact, precise, and accurate. "NT" is still better than nothing. Shatin is already well satisfactory. ,

Please don't blindly add `=crossing` on every `=service` . Worldwide, it's usually not added for flat ones .

Can you stop fiddling with the data. You have cause enough damage. Please explain what you are trying to do, and ask for help first.

Lack of reacts doesn't mean one part of a comment is good or bad. I described many issues, with my opinions. Others don't have to agree with all of them.
"However, this does not mean "feel free to ignore existing tagging schemes " osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like

Please don't use `historic=tomb` if it's not known to be `historic=` . Use `cemetery=grave`

Please don't `loc_name=` of other features on housing estates. Use OpenHistoricalMap.

Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `description=` has already been used.

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11216261

Please stop fiddling with the data for debugging. Besides both `oneway=yes` being wrong, and you swapped `lanes:forward=` + `lanes:backward=` , routing graphs don't get rebuilt very frequently.

I don't see what you are doing, and you removed `name:en=`

Please don't blindly follow map labels and sign titles directly. They can be made in different formats for presentation and viewing.
Top-right mentions them separately. It's very clear it means different sections. Furthermore, the plural "trails" suggests it is a system, not a single `route=` .
Please read osm.wiki/Names#Multiple_names and osm.wiki/Walking_Routes

Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `description=` has already been used.

Please don't add multiple names to `name=` . `alt_name=` should be followed. Furthermore, they should have a `route=` created, not be added as `name=` .

You broke it by merely disconnecting the `=steps`

What was wrong here? You simply replaced a `=sidewalk` with `=pedestrian` ?