You didn't even change airmark=beacon#Examples

Where have you gotten approval for re-tagging the standard semicolon multival pattern to a non-standard style? Except the page you created this week osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Tag:beacon:type=VOR/DME&action=history
While both have jumps in 2017~2018, semicolon seems to have more steady growth https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/beacon:type/VOR%2FDME&***/beacon:type/VOR;DME
osm.wiki/Proposal:Radio_navigation_aids is from 2012. It's using `type=` , which shouldn't be used.

Please don't delete info with obvious mistakes that can be corrected https://www.topshoulder.com.hk/contact-us.html

Please observe carefully. This is the main route of Castle Peak Rd via Shui Pin Wai Interchange to Yuen Long Northern Bypass due to restricted lane change.

The left-turn slip lane and flyover forms the main route of Castle Peak Rd. Network-wise, Kam Tin Rd can be considered a fork.

Did you include the `roof:levels=1` in `building:levels=` count ?

I use `sidewalk=` first because you need to check whether they are all correctly connected. Many are poorly drawn. Afterwards, should be `sidewalk:*=separate` + `sidewalk:*=no` by side.

Please don't upload fictitious personal data. This is a live public database. It is considered vandalism.

Please don't remove `wikidata=`

You made a typo turning them from `=service` to `=secondary`

Please try to add these to OpenHistoricalMap instead. OSM should only have what still have physical trace. The middle section away from Sha Tau Kok Rd may be doubted.

Please don't add not yet open features directly. Use `construction:*=`

Please don't add not yet open features directly. Use `construction:*=`

https://osmcha.org/changesets/144435963/

Please don't simply delete them as they represent a shop space, and may contain addresses. Change them to a plaint "point" to remove the feature.

Can you please stop creating fake `historic=` features? Other wrong examples don't justify more wrongs.

Ok what are you doing here except to break routing for the ability to cross the street there?

Also for those that are closer to `=footway` , you will need to reprovide crosswalks. Currently they can't be routed

Please don't disconnect `=pedestrian` from roads. They are pedestrianized vehicular roads.

Please don't delete the `landuse=` . It is for describing the site, or incompletely the lower part of building. It also contains the address that you removed together.