This shouldn't be done for data topology reasons. Eg you would not move them from `building=` to `type=building` either.

1. The issue of `=motorway_junction` on restricted lane change braided ramps is quite uncertain. I discussed with Apple or some company once before. It is desirable not to duplicate it, while in this case North Point on-slip needs to be considered too. Now I imagine some form of `destination:*=` on the point of diverging may help. But you have already added `junction:ref=` (regardless of whether this is the best solution), so the `=motorway_junction` isn't absolutely necessary.
2. Although I don't agree with it fully, you are supposed keep the separate `highway=speed_camera` next to the road. The `type=enforcement` is sufficient to show what road section is being monitored.

Please don't modify the entire building. That's what you have edited here. Create a new point inside.

The other one looks correct (I'm not using Telegram)

This is actually for the larger `boundary=administrative` it is naming. There is another item for this location.

Please at least add `bicycle=yes` back to them. And I find `*cn_=yes` more proper and informative.

You haven't fixed it. At most, there is a `route=hiking` . No `route=mtb` .

Your other edits changeset/141012355 and changeset/141012355 hasn't been adding them to it.

You could coordinate on Discord to let everyone to see, not that it is crowded. Or use the wiki page. osm.wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Routes#專營巴士_Franchised_buses

Eg changeset/140987678
And `route=bicycle` removed on `highway=` without belonging such a `type=route`. This can be valid if the class of `*cn=yes` wasn't determined yet, https://osmcha.org/changesets/140798528
Fundamentally `*cn=yes` is acceptable. `ref=` and `network=` aren't removed from roads with `route=road` created.

For completeness, `*cn_ref=` is valid when they belong to a `=node_network`

There is complain in changeset/140987678

This user has been mass removing `*cn=yes` in cases where the `route=bicycle` doesn't exist.

Have you discussed this before? The situation is `surface:colour=` means the `*cn=yes` . as such it can only have one `network=` , making `network=` usable. These `route=bicycle` are not really existing, and I don't agree with `network:type=basic_network`.

Please don't add not yet opened features directly. They should use eg `construction:leisure=swimming_pool` .

Please don't delete it. This is the result of previous flawed edits. It should be fixed up.

`highway=service` + `area=yes` is correct here. The `=station` + `=bus_station` should be moved.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `=construction` already indicates this.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. This confuses whether they are named already. `proposed:name=` hjas already been prepared.

Please don't add fictions restrictions. `=use_sidepath` and `sidewalk=` is enough.