I have been mapping addresses on OpenStreetMap since a long time. During this time I have been also frequently referring to the wiki page for guidance whenever I felt my method was wrong. This post is the result of all the stupid mistakes I found during this checking of wiki. I hope that others wouldn’t make those same stupid mistakes.

Though this post is based on my experience in India, it should be useful to people elsewhere in the world.

The mapping process looks like this:

1. Check if the neighbourhood or the street is present on the map. If it’s not, then add it.
2. Create the building if it’s not on the map. Then add addr:street (or addr:place) and addr:housenumber (or addr:housename) to the building depending on the address.

That’s it. Now let’s elaborate on some things.

… See full entry

Most of our mapping parties, if not all, start with a brief introduction. The newbies are informed about the various benefits of using and contributing to OpenStreetMap, such as massive improvements to the individual’s privacy and an easy mechanism to correct data.

However, I have been wondering if this approach is the optimal path. This doubt started nagging me after I picked up The Theory of the Leisure Class by Thorstein Veblen. If class distinctions are really so pervasive as theorized in the book, shouldn’t we try to incorporate these findings in our promotion of OSM in mapping parties and everywhere else?

A clear description of the context would be in order. Though our existing method of extolling the benefits of OSM is good, I don’t think it is the best one for India. India has, unfortunately, one of the lowest proportion of people contributing to social activities. In conversation with my friends, I often find them considering the idea of “doing something for free” repugnant. Maybe its due to the oppressive nature of the Indian classes, where people’s aspirations are mostly reduced to the singular objective of rising above their current class. Whatever is the reason, we can at least conclude that the current system of promoting OSM is unsatisfactory in the context of India.

We can, for instance, try to frame OSM as a hobby and actively compare the intensity of mapping activity with other mappers (say, by focusing on the heat map that is displayed on the OSM profile page). Setting aside the moral considerations this entails, I believe this approach is likely to bring some interesting results. People may or may not be excited by the idea of increasing their reputation by performing conspicuous leisure in the form of contributions. However, it must be tested on field before we derive any conclusions.

This diary entry was first posted on my website under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

I have a craze for adding addresses to OSM. Unfortunately, in Delhi it is ridiculously hard to find a place with addresses properly displayed on the front. If you come across a house with no nameplate on it, you can be almost sure to not guess the correct house number.

This irks me a lot. So, I have decided to look for guide maps made by the locals while travelling around the city, and use those to map the neighbourhoods. I have got some nice pictures, which I have uploaded to my commons profile.

Here’s one I recently clicked. The amount of detail really supplements my survey a lot.

This diary entry is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Delhi Cantonment is one of the most sparsely mapped area in Delhi. It might be because it is full of military areas. As I live in the cantonment, I hope to map at least the non-sensitive areas, such as Sadar Bazar and Gopinath Bazar. By my current rate, it is likely to take at least 2 months to map these two markets alone. In future I might venture out to map the big Nangal area (gulp).

This diary entry is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.