OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
83278667 over 5 years ago

Hello Ipswich City Council,

Just wanted to bring to your attention that combining road sections can adversely impact tags on the ways, as well as relations which rely on separate road sections.

In this case, the sections of the same road were split to facilitate lane and turn:lane tag changes, and add turn restriction and destination_sign relations. I have reverted the section combine in changeset changeset/84226052

Please be careful when combining roads as you continue to make excellent contributions to OSM data.

Thank you,
Kana Lee

79998323 almost 6 years ago

This changeset was reverted in changeset/79998359

changeset/79998359

78895345 about 6 years ago

Correct source is Mapillary Images.

78894731 about 6 years ago

Correct source is Mapillary Images.

78894549 about 6 years ago

Correct source is Mapillary Images.

78893600 about 6 years ago

Correct source is Mapillary Images.

78782564 about 6 years ago

This changeset is intended to reverse changeset

changeset/77043513

77043513 about 6 years ago

This changeset was reversed by changeset

changeset/78782564

77043494 about 6 years ago

This changeset was reversed by changeset changeset/78781697

78781697 about 6 years ago

This changeset is meant to reverse changeset
changeset/77043494

78781256 about 6 years ago

This changeset is meant to reverse changeset

changeset/77043402

77043402 about 6 years ago

This changeset has been revised by changeset

changeset/78781256

78780916 about 6 years ago

This changeset corrects edits made in changeset changeset/77043231

77043231 about 6 years ago

After review, this changeset was reversed by changeset changeset/78780916

77042359 about 6 years ago

Confirmation via Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/yuYnib-LAfxyvJcn1taYHg

77043544 about 6 years ago

Hello ortho_is_hot,

Thank you for reaching out! The set of 20 changesets was intended to update access=destination tags added by members of the Microsoft Open Maps Team prior to the talk-au discussion and bring them inline with current community standards based on such.

After speaking with the original mapper of this way, Aleksandar Matejevic, the access=destination tag was intended to capture access restrictions from the gate visible in LPI aerial imagery. I mistakenly believed it was based on a Local Traffic Only sign which, per our current understanding of the talk-au thread, should be modeled as a motor_vehicle:advisory=destination.

I have removed the destination tag entirely, as it no longer seems to fit with the requirements for access=destination or motor_vehicle:advisory=destination. On Monday, I will review the other changesets to ensure that edits made by our team match current modeling standards.

Please let me know if I can answer any questions or if there are areas we can improve.

Thank you,
Kana Lee

73597841 over 6 years ago

OpenStreetCam was also used on this changeset

72435718 over 6 years ago

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=q0IUcpGDTZg7NQnuHyQv5S

72434537 over 6 years ago

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=-drFCN9Y136ciOtOp5ez7e

72362149 over 6 years ago

This changeset was incorrect and was correct in changeset/72363633