Thanks for fixing this. Please try and add a meaningful changeset comment so other OSM mappers can understand the changes you've made

Issue fixed: changeset/59456773

Would it be possible to add more descriptive changeset comments please? It's really useful for mappers local to the changes to understand what the editor was trying to achieve.

You've added some features around here:
osm.org/#map=14/0.0032/-0.0126
which seems to be a long way from the other edits in the changeset.

Are you sure that the areas you added exist?

Thanks for the clarification. Was asking because the stop still appears in the traveline data for the route.

The OSMI PTv2 validator has flagged the Lancaster => Knott End variant, as the route misses some of the stops. Any idea if this route variation is temporary or more permanent?

relation/6152381#map=16/53.9273/-2.9873

Some of the bus stops on the Lancaster => Blackpool route variation, are also not visited

relation/8102581#map=17/53.81955/-3.04733

Thanks for your edit. I'm just wondering whether the routing of Bus 42 (Blackpool => Lancaster) is correct? The route doesn't seem to visit the Abingdon Street bus stop, at the blackpool end of the route
relation/4483907

Keepright has flagged that you have put `traffic_calming=humps`; where `humps` should be `hump`

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=86&error=112948611

I think the aqueduct might go "over" this bridge. below the footpath, but inside the bridge itself. The bridge is very well built and it's a strange place for it to be otherwise.

way/125028047

Relation 487 seems to be invalid, and contains some gaps
relation/7919795
Would you like to fix it, or do I need to?

Thanks - I hadn't seen the note. Have turned on the notes layer in JOSM now. Removed in changeset/56868584

Just wondering if you know anything about the "narrow guage railway" (way/461227090)? I'm suspicious because I can't see anything on the aerial imagery and because railways don't have such sharp bends.

I've updated Kendal bus Station. On most stops; the local_ref should perhaps match the naptan:indicator?

See example at https://bustimes.org/stops/090079360954 which renders `nr` and `opp`. The transport layer in OSM should show you which bus_stops around kendal still have local_ref

I normally edit using JOSM so it hadn't occurred to me that it was a predefined option in the editor. It's probably unnecessary to add the tag, and lots of the roads in the UK don't explicitly specify `oneway=no`. However I don't see there's any harm in doing so, and from selecting a larger area in overpass turbo, it is more common that I thought.

Thanks for all the editing you've been doing round Lancaster. The map is looking much more complete now.

This is not necessarily a fault of yours, but as the last person to edit the bus station I thought I'd comment here.

I'm wondering if the value of the local_ref tag should be the stand number rather than `AT`

local%20ref=*?uselang=en-GB

Is there a particular reason why you've been adding `oneway=no` on quite a few roads? I think the lack of `oneway=yes` can be safely used to assume that two-way traffic is allowed.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/wx1

Whilst the stop appears in data on both Traveline (OGL) and Stagecoach (licence unknown) websites; I feel that the physical evidence is suggesting that buses do not stop there. I think it's best if I revert edits in this area

When I used the 555 bus recently, from Kendal to Lancaster, I don't recall the bus pulling into the northbound layby. The AtcoCode for the southbound bus_stop appears in bus route data for a number of different routes.

I think adding `physically_present=no` would be good. I'm unsure about removing the `highway=bus_stop`

osm.wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data#physically_present

I was going to add that when I do the 555 Kendal to Lancaster section. But thanks for adding it