Hi Stephan,

I think regardless, the roads should be disconnected as its not clear that the road really connects even in standard.

I upgraded the road to residential as these are significant streets so it seems appropriate. We tend to use service for driveways if there are only a building or two on a short way.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

You are absolutely correct. I have updated the road types and surface tags.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I split the way at the intersection and left the top half as residential. It has a fair number of houses along it so I think the residential tag is justified. The southern half has no houses so I changed it to track.

Thanks for the feedback,
jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I added the unpaved tag in the east part of the road, but that intersection looks correctly like a four way to me. I centered the intersection a bit but left as was. Can you take another look and let me know if you still disagree.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

Agreed, that these don't fit the definition of unclassified despite their surprisingly high road quality. I changed them to track past the residential portion but just removed the surface tag rather than explicitly marking paved as its possible its gravel of some sort.

Thanks as always for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

Yikes, this should have been fixed in the initial publishing and we haven't cleaned up the entire project yet. I have fixed many of the issues in the area and will have this area fully cleaned up ASAP.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

This bridge was created and tagged by EndlessRoundabout actually.

-Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

We appreciate the positive feedback!

-Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I restricted the unpaved tag to just the area I could see that was unpaved.

Thanks for feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

The imagery is not entirely clear, but in DG standard, the road appears to have been fully paved. Take a look and let me know if you agree.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

We originally skipped over this area when you were working in it. We're looping back to it now and this province is in the process of getting published. This issue will get corrected once we do.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

Yeah, the editor should have been checked standard where there was cloud cover. I've extended the way now.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

Good catch. I made the connection and changed the road to residential.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

This is a pretty weird case. It is a surprisingly good quality road but isn't really connecting up two settlements and mostly just seems to be a farm road. I've gone ahead and upgraded though.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

Good catch, that looks like a false connection. I've removed it. Thanks for the feedback.

-Jeff

Hi Tom,

I added a few connections I saw near the changeset area, but do you have a way id for this issue so I can confirm I caught your issue?

Thanks,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

I agree. I suspect the user was thinking service due to the reservoir it ran next to but track seems more appropriate.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

I've upgraded the road, but for proper routing 612351802 and at least part of 612351802 should probably also get upgraded. You tagged them so I will let you decide.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

Thanks for the feedback. I've removed the false connection.

-Jeff

Hi Tom,
I updated that road to unclassified.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff