Thankyou. The tag was a mistake. I've fixed the tags in changeset - 135025739

Thanks for the praise. With Exmouth being a "tourist" town, it's normal for things to appear each year. I'll take a look in the next few days.

jass

Hello,

You've mapped a monument in this changeset.
node/10796982893

I know the area, and am not aware of any monument. Can you tell me what the monument was?

Hi, in this changeset and a few other, you've created an area and added tags "barrier=hedge" and "landuse=farmland". The tag "barrier=hedge" can be used for area, and the way you've tagged is resulting in vast areas being considered hedges. I believe the advise is to map hedges on top of the farmland tag, with breaks for entrances. Jass.

Hi, thanks for updating this road.

I made some changes to the road and it now has slightly different tagging.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/456174990

Change from access=no, to access=private. Private is more realistic since the road is used to access properties. Then adding foot=designated there is foot access for everyone, despite the private tag.

Made some other changes in area using Public Footpath data from
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/

Hi, I can see two planters on imagery. Which would block car access but allow cycle access, and possibly motorcycle access. I've made changes in following changeset
changeset/134139668

I've added barrier=planter, and motor_vehicle=no; foot=yes; and bicycle=yes.

Can you confirm this was there recently?
Do you know if Motorcycles can get through the barrier.

The road is still privately owned by the developers, and has not been taken over the council. When the council adopt the road I assume the council would make it official with a traffic order.

Thanks, I should have known better

Hi quishpapa. You have affectively duplicated tags? The station had the tag proposed:railway=station, and you've added railway=station, plus a couple of other tags that apply it's functioning as a station. The station is still not open so I assume the "proposed" part should still be before several of the tags?

I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154

I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154

I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154

I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154

I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154

I am gradually removing the cycling route relation for the Tour de Manche. The following link to forum explain reasons, and approach.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/itineraire-velo-tour-de-manche/13154

Yes, land movement is happening inland of the road. Discussed in my email to Talk-GB mailing list. A few posts later there's discussion about the new route of "English Coast Path". It's been rerouted to the south along the footpath but we don't have a OSM suitable source yet. Bus route is a problem because it doesn't appear to be a public bus route and there's a lack of publicly available route data.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-March/030133.html

Issues with pedestrians getting around initial barrier, so it has been heavily f

Hi Sec147, I sent a message to you about this type of changeset. Where you move address from node to building, ignoring local style of address adding. Could you please respond.

Hi sec147. Can you give more details. whether there has been a recent change to sign. From my knowledge the highway signage, supported by the Traffic Order, were correctly mapped in OSM in that they allowed all uses of the road, but the road was for motor vehicles a "dead end" if travelling from east or west due to a short section being made "no motor vehicles".

From looking at google maps (not a useable source) a yellow sign is present at either end stating "access to school only". If these signs are the source of the change, I feel that change is wrong. The signs are not statutory traffic order signs that enforce rules on how to use the road. The information is also clearly wrong.

I'd suggest that yellow signs are added clutter to make more visible the fact the road in no longer a cut through rat run.

If the yellow signs are what you're referring to, and is taken literally, then it applies to both sides of Hollow Lane, and to cyclists, and residents and visitors to approx 7 houses.

This is more of a general topic, rather than a changeset topic. I'll send you message through the "message" system.

Hi, I recently made edits to this junction that may have caused the issue you fixed. Using the video from recent visit (cycle cam), and images I've previously submitted to Mapillary. I'm confident I can spot the stickers on posts. Made some slight changes to move walking route from carriageway to footway (pavement) indicated by stickers. I'll have a look next couple of weeks to confirm stickers.

Hi sec147. You're recently adding huge amounts of useful address info, but you're also moving addresses from points to buildings. Your style of adding all addresses to buildings conflicts with style of address "adding" commonly used in this area. Addresses are commonly added as points. I'd suggest giving consideration to how other local mappers have added addresses and not change without initial talking?