1. Re-added airstrip descriptive. Existence is confirmed by multiple sources. If the aerodrome was recently closed, please do not remove, but rather add "disused:" to the tagging of both aerodrome and runway. Thanks for collab!

    Closed
    #153921921 1 1 0 0

  2. Further reversals of suspected vandalism

    Closed
    #153921464 0 1 0 0

  3. Further reversals of suspected vandalism

    Closed
    #153921406 0 1 0 0

  4. Further reversals of suspected vandalism

    Closed
    #153921355 0 2 0 0

  5. Further reversals of suspected vandalism

    Closed
    #153921252 0 2 0 0

  6. I removed a double entry, but find the mapping still confusing. What's the use of a relation with one member???

    Closed
    #153890776 0 0 1 0

  7. Added resto - the mapping of eateries in France leaves quite some room for improvement :(

    Closed
    #153889678 1 0 0 0

  8. Added pizzeria - the mapping of eateries in France leaves quite some room for improvement :(

    Closed
    #153888958 1 0 0 0

  9. resto is long closed, building is derelict, at the point of collapsing

    Closed
    #153888518 0 1 0 0

  10. More reversal of obvious vandalism.

    Closed
    #153886649 0 2 0 0

  11. local_ref from official Russian documentation. Should we keep the old Ukrainian ICAO code?

    Closed
    #153886310 0 1 0 0

  12. added runway

    Closed
    #153839278 3 1 0 0

  13. reverted some suspected vandalism, pending reaction from DWG

    Closed
    #153829541 0 5 0 0

  14. tentatively added name

    Closed
    #153403517 1 0 0 0

  15. Removed aerodrome-specific info from runway - cfr. node 9845982840

    Closed
    #153402870 0 2 0 0

  16. added airfield and its runway

    Closed
    #153402093 6 0 0 0

  17. local_ref

    Closed
    #153401379 0 1 0 0

  18. removed invalid runway refs. if disused, add disused=yes tag, please

    Closed
    #153323323 0 2 0 0

  19. removed double information

    Closed
    #153321991 0 1 1 0

  20. typo in name

    Closed
    #153321400 0 1 0 0