1. Tentatively added airstrip descriptive.

    Closed
    #136779983 1 0 0 0

  2. added www reference

    Closed
    #136754631 0 1 0 0

  3. .

    Closed
    #136754027 0 1 0 0

  4. not really an airport, just a (very nice!) recreational airfield

    Closed
    #136754004 0 1 0 0

  5. re-added icao code after discussion

    Closed
    #136691236 0 1 0 0

  6. Added airstrip descriptive to recently added runway

    Closed
    #136690887 1 0 0 0

  7. removed iata & icao codes - neither are confirmed by the official source

    Closed
    #136687687 0 1 0 8

  8. Another runway that popped up just like that

    Closed
    #136647275 5 0 0 0

  9. added defunct runway

    Closed
    #136616279 5 0 0 0

  10. Assumed disused since its removal from basulm

    Closed
    #136615803 0 1 0 0

  11. removed incorrect "name="tag

    Closed
    #136589048 0 1 0 0

  12. Will never be an aerodrome again in that form, so "disused" is not explicit enough.

    Closed
    #136576689 0 1 0 0

  13. dubbelinfo verwijderd

    Closed
    #136575354 0 1 0 0

  14. Added airstrip from maps.aopa.ru - non-official source.

    Closed
    #136532736 6 0 0 0

  15. tagged aerodrome and runway as disused. local_ref is from unofficial maps.aopa.ru

    Closed
    #136489262 0 2 0 0

  16. airstrip & runway assumed disused since their removal from basulm

    Closed
    #136364620 0 2 0 0

  17. Quel conflit? Ce tagging est utilisé pour la grande plupart des terrains ulm en France. Pour un seul example, voir way 118617414 = Base ulm de Cestas (Bdx)

    Closed
    #136328275 0 1 0 0

  18. Temporarily closed

    Closed
    #136328081 0 1 0 0

  19. Another runway that I stumbled upon while strolling the www. More details known? Name, operator?

    Closed
    #136327620 3 0 0 0

  20. Corrected my own mistake - mixed up LP35 with LP65

    Closed
    #136289636 0 1 0 0