1. added local_ref in Latin characters

    Closed
    #129691695 0 1 0 0

  2. tagged aerodrome & its runway as disused, as per en:wikipedia

    Closed
    #129691584 0 2 0 0

  3. removed iata code: it is no longer assigned

    Closed
    #129646023 0 1 0 0

  4. removed iata code: it is no longer assigned

    Closed
    #129645942 0 1 0 0

  5. removed iata code: it is no longer assigned

    Closed
    #129644205 0 1 0 0

  6. removed iata code: it is no longer assigned ; plus retagged inappropriate "name=" from runways & taxiways

    Closed
    #129643772 0 5 0 0

  7. ... and a few more details

    Closed
    #129643295 0 2 0 0

  8. added runway

    Closed
    #129643177 3 0 0 0

  9. added name tentatively

    Closed
    #129636963 0 1 0 0

  10. removed iata code: it is no longer assigned

    Closed
    #129604464 0 4 0 0

  11. removed iata code: it is no longer assigned

    Closed
    #129604235 0 1 0 0

  12. further cleanup of aerodrome

    Closed
    #129603498 0 2 0 0

  13. removed inappropriate "name=" tags from runway & taxiway

    Closed
    #129603450 0 2 0 0

  14. tag standardisation

    Closed
    #129603413 0 1 0 0

  15. standard tagging is "disused" rather than "defunct"

    Closed
    #129600699 0 2 0 0

  16. stating the obvious ...

    Closed
    #129600558 0 1 0 0

  17. All sources agree that the field is disused, satellite imagery confirms. So I tagged aerodrome plus runways accordingly. We might wish to completely remove them.

    Closed
    #129600487 0 3 0 0

  18. Only going by satellite imagery, this does look like runway :)

    Closed
    #129598460 3 0 0 0

  19. "ETJA" refers to a chain of military radar stations, not to the aerodrome

    Closed
    #129554220 0 1 0 0

  20. added shop details

    Closed
    #129534458 0 1 0 0