1. eleborated on aerodrome & runway, based upon operator's website

    Closed
    #145871724 0 2 0 0

  2. yes it is really disused

    Closed
    #145837805 0 1 0 0

  3. elaborated on new aerodrome

    Closed
    #145833657 0 2 0 0

  4. newly created recreational aerodrome

    Closed
    #145833384 6 0 0 0

  5. added icao code as per www.dlapilota.pl

    Closed
    #145832780 0 2 0 0

  6. shuffled names

    Closed
    #145831770 0 1 0 0

  7. updated aerodrome

    Closed
    #145807748 0 1 0 0

  8. local_ref & runway length as per www.dl.cz

    Closed
    #145791107 0 2 0 0

  9. local_ref & runway length as per www.dl.cz

    Closed
    #145791012 0 2 0 0

  10. local_ref as per www.dl.cz, now confirmed

    Closed
    #145771874 0 3 0 0

  11. Updated from www.dl.cz

    Closed
    #145771568 0 2 0 0

  12. local_ref & runway length as per www.dl.cz

    Closed
    #145771268 0 2 0 0

  13. basulm: "Base ULM fermée définitivement"

    Closed
    #145762403 0 1 0 0

  14. basulm: "Base ULM fermée définitivement"

    Closed
    #145762327 0 2 0 0

  15. re-opened, apparently. Also updated runway dimensions & added elevation

    Closed
    #145762184 0 2 0 0

  16. No, PT-0042 is not a valid icao code, either. ICAO codes look like LP[A-Z][A-Z]. Where does this PT0042 ref come from, anyway? The "LP64" is much better, it comes from an official document and should be more than sufficient.

    Closed
    #145761343 0 1 0 1

  17. local_ref & runway length as per www.dl.cz

    Closed
    #145761115 0 2 0 0

  18. removed "LKCHAB", not referenced anywhere

    Closed
    #145761048 0 1 0 0

  19. runway is marked with crosses ==> runway disused ==> aerodrome = closed

    Closed
    #145742013 0 2 0 0

  20. Added airstrip and its runway - approximately

    Closed
    #145727013 10 0 0 0