Ayyy 1k

Progress…

Hello sconner1987, and welcome to Openstreetmap! I just have an FYI about your change here - Unless "Maintenance" is the official name of this building, please don't tag it as such. You could retag the building as a shed, maybe, but please don't use the name field for a description, if that's what it is. Thanks!

Surveyed with video capture

well, driveways and footpaths

*driveways

*time at 4am

Yes this took me like 4 hours of distracted time

What did this changeset do? There are still likely lines in the ground that are roads, no? and "CHANGES" (Amendments) is not the best description of a changeset.

tradução

O que esse conjunto de alterações fez? Ainda existem prováveis ​​linhas no solo que são estradas, não? e "ALTERAÇÃO" não é a melhor descrição.

still pretty ugly-looking

Tried to preserve a bit of history here... there's definitely more to be done

Just a heads-up - don't name things what they are, that's what the feature type is for. I changed these for you.

Again, apologies for the large changeset. I am trying to limit these to a specific coast but forgot about one in NJ

For future reference, don't name things what they are, that is covered in the feature type. Also don't use nondescript changeset comments such as this.
Thanks!

My bad. Didn't notice one of the fields was in the Philippines, otherwise it would have been limited to north america.

For future reference, please don't name things what they are, like "baseball field", because the feature type already tells that.

Whatever the hell you did here, it was vandalism to the map. To do things like this, try OpenGeoFiction.

Just a notice if you ever read this, springs (and other things with feature types) should not be named what their feature type is (or as something like "unnamed spring"), as that would be putting it in twice unnecessarily. I'm going to try to rectify mapping practices like this, but I'm not perfect. So contact me with any questions.
Thanks,
I-76

Just a notice if you ever read this, cell towers (and other things with feature types) should not be named what their feature type is, as that would be putting it in twice unnecessarily. I'm going to try to rectify mapping practices like this, but I'm not perfect. So contact me with any questions.
Thanks,
I-76

Please comment on this changeset if you'd like to speak about it.

The reason this changeset is so short is because I was showing somebody how Rapid works.