Hufkratzer's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130842434 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 130819701 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 130702408 | almost 3 years ago | Hi,
way/368281781 you have tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (2 years ago), but this area looks more like a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding). |
| 130568975 | almost 3 years ago | Ich habe mal das leisure=horse_riding von den Gebäuden entfernt
|
| 130459649 | almost 3 years ago | Hi, you have replaced the building tag on way/31207877 with leisure=horse_riding . In the aerial view this area looks like a building. Every building should have a building tag. Also the horse_riding tag should not be used for a specific building but for the whole riding centre and therefore it is on surrounding way/658370928. Mapping two nested areas for one riding centre does not make sense. See also
|
| 130225606 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
You have also tagged way/1123201000 with leisure=horse_riding, but this area looks like a bunch of paddocks; they probably belong to some riding centre together with the riding arena mentioned above. Here is an example from Italy that demonstrates a correct use of the horse_riding tag:
|
| 130106851 | about 3 years ago | Sorry, I must confess that I did not see that the horse_riding tag was already present in the multipolygon relations before. I have now changed leisure=horse_riding + natural=sand to leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian + surface=sand. I don't know what exactly these areas are used for, but I'm pretty sure they are not equestrian centres. BTW: Maybe the multipolygons were used on purpose to separate area tags (horse riding) from linear tags (fence), compare discussion https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/514 |
| 130106851 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 130038733 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 129978472 | about 3 years ago | Hi, the 2 areas that you have tagged with leisure=horse_riding look more like riding arenas. The wiki recommends to tag riding arenas with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. See
|
| 128845661 | about 3 years ago | Super, dann kann ich ja bei Gelegenheit deine anderen von der Sorte auch gefahrlos umtaggen ohne dich zu verärgern. |
| 129900838 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 129813961 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
Das kleine Gebäude way/203623639 ist natürlich auch keine Reitanlage, aber das war ja schon vorher falsch getaggt. Den Preset für "Reitplatz" kann man in JOSM leider bis jetzt nur etwas mühsam finden, indem man z.B. nach "pferd" sucht und dann "Pferdesport" wählt. |
| 128560711 | about 3 years ago | building=stable ist dann dafür richtig; aber ein Stall ist keine Reitanlage, also das leisure=horse_riding würde ich von dem Stall entfernen, vgl. osm.wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding |
| 129619693 | about 3 years ago | JOSM kann leider (noch) keine Aliase/Suchworte, siehe https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/14404 |
| 129686745 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
Hier noch zwei andere Reitplätze von dir mit dem gleichen Problem:
|
| 129660172 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 129619693 | about 3 years ago | Hi,
|
| 129581284 | about 3 years ago | Hi, way/1118498813 hast du mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt (Preset "Reitanlage"). Sieht aber aus wie ein Reitplatz (Preset "Reitplatz", Tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Da du die Tags ansonsten - soweit ich gesehen habe - immer richtig verwendet hast, vermute ich eine versehentliche Verwechslung. |
| 129416272 | about 3 years ago | If it were boxes, it would be a horse stable (building=stable). But I have never seen such a round stable. From above, it looks like a horse walker, compare to this one: way/1010966098.
|