Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dit bidrag.
Jeg har fjernet de motor_vehicle=yes tags du satte, fordi det dels er implicit for og dels negerede det access=no du også satte.

I have reverted the changes you made to the crossing at osm.org/?mlat=56.17681&mlon=8.90972#map=19/56.17681/8.90972.
The way you did it, it ended up being misleading.
Also I think it's absolutely silly to create oneways around islands that small.

I reverted already.
I did in fact read the sentence in it's entirety and we apparently just read it in different ways. The way I read it there's no "recommendation" to put the tags on a node only if the village boundary isn't perfectly well defined. It's only said that you can "consider" it. Also I think that when the entire village is practically residential it's perfectly ok to put the place=* etc tags on the landuse=residential polygon.

In some hamlets buildings are spread out with fields, etc in between. Because you can't really define a boundary I use a node only for these, but for fairly welldefined villages like Fjellerup I think it's usually better to tag the polygon.

Also note the sentence "although the area has clearly advantages even if only approximative. " in the text you linked to.

I dont' see that as a good reason to have place=* etc on a node only. Mind you that I've been working to transfer lots village names etc to polygons. If the place=* covers more than just a residential area the better choice would be to create a polygon which encompasses the other areas too rather than just create a node.

Why did you remove the place=village from the polygon?

In Denmark we are following our official classifications, which doesn't necessarily follow systems found elsewhere. If you look around Denmark you'll find lots of relatively short stretches of road classified as trunk. Maxspeed on these are usually 90 km/h and you're not allowed to walk or drive slow vehicles.

Bemærk at restrictions med mere eller mindre end 3 medlemmer (1 "from", 1 "via" punkt, 1 "to") ikke lader til at være gyldige.
I mange tilfælde kan det være bedre at anbringe et lille stykke oneway i stedet.

You can do this by making sure that iD is opened in Denmark

When editing in Denmark, please be sure to use our national imagery over Bing etc.

Why did you change this? As far as I can see it's actually signed as a trunk road: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=WXdrBj6QCh-ujzsD0RXE7g&lat=56.15747528&lng=10.07113802&z=17 . Also note the source:maxspeed on way/130294812

Imerco is more like a shop=houseware

check_date=* might be better

Bemærk at her er tale om en Maps.me bruger uden forudgående erfaring med redigering i OSM. Ofte har disse ingen ide om at de lige har lavet tilføjelser til OSM, så her er det generelt bedst bare at slette evt dubletter eller andre fejl

I feel adding source=Kaart* to way/87905545 or node/4408160855 is taking a bit too much credit for work you didn't do. All you did was add a addr:street tag

Du fik rodet 2 adresser sammen her

They are quite popular in Denmark. That's why I know :-)

Røde Kors shops etc are best tagged shop=charity

Jeg tror vi skal lade det være som det er nu :-). Der er ikke foregået decideret vandalisme, men vi retter jo allesammen på hinandens ting og vedkommende har måske ikke helt forstået situationen. Han redigerer normalt ovre omkring Fredericia.