Hjart's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 62185833 | over 7 years ago | Jeg har rullet din ændring af way/526008125 tilbage. Denne vej er efter min vurdering en prober "residential" vej. Jeg har også ændret din "path" til footway da jeg vurderer dette til at være mere akkurat. |
| 62187135 | over 7 years ago | Please note that previously only the 2-way cycleways here were mapped as separate ways. the bicycle lanes through the town were and still is tagged as cycleway=lane. This is usually the better solution so I'll probably revert your changes. |
| 62177697 | over 7 years ago | Er der virkelig en autocamperplads her? Det ser umiddelbart en smule usandsynligt ud. |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Oh, you can actually see tiny arrow heads midway between the nodes on i.e. way/42761967 |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | iD was meant to be easy. I guess that's why it's hiding petty details like that ;-) |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Oh, and streams too: way/89405717 |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Appears in iD you can only see the direction on oneway roads like way/502197323 |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Every way in OSM has a direction. Not sure why you can't see this in iD (I almost always use JOSM), but the direction of the one I linked to is north. |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Do also note that disconnected footways are useless for pedestrian routing. |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Yes, of course :-) You're welcome. |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Disconnected footways like these always keep flaring up in error reporting tools like https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ , so we usually end up just removing them. |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | What I mean by tagging footways on a residential road: way/42761965 |
| 62137320 | over 7 years ago | Do also note that it's usually way better to tag footways on the residential roads than creating separate ways for them. |
| 62137143 | over 7 years ago | Please note that footways etc should connect properly to other roads. I've corrected it here. |
| 62092822 | over 7 years ago | Please confer with other more experienced mappers in your area before performing more imports. I just ran JOSM's validator over the Stenstorp area. It found 4000+ duplicate nodes (which I have deleted in changeset/62131660 ) + a number of buildings within other buildings etc |
| 62106707 | over 7 years ago | Hi
|
| 62082092 | over 7 years ago | Det ville naturligvis have været en god ide at henvise til vor lille diskussion på note/1505889 , så det er hermed gjort :-) |
| 62082092 | over 7 years ago | Super :-) |
| 62049854 | over 7 years ago | Jeg har lagt Kvickly tilbage på bygningen, da det i praksis er deres. Jeg kender flere andre steder hvor apoteker på tilsvarende vis har lejet sig ind i en Superbrugs eller Kvickly. |
| 61973384 | over 7 years ago | Please note that I did not remove the ferry. I just removed it from the multipolygon relation/8320226 which it was messing up. |