OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
125999453 over 3 years ago

How intriguing! Were you able to walk around those footpath bits?

125932468 over 3 years ago

Plans to demolish reported in 2020: https://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/lifestyle/plans-unveiled-to-demolish-archway-methodist-hall-and-restore-it-3789596

And (I'm going off topic for mapping purposes here but...) look at these amazing photos taken *inside* the derelict hall in 2021: https://www.28dayslater.co.uk/threads/archway-methodist-hall-london-september-2021.130312/

125932468 over 3 years ago

It's misleading to have it rendering "Archway Methodist Church" on this building, since the church by that name is still active in the adjoining building. This derelict building was the "Archway Central Hall". More info in this heritage appraisal doc: https://planning.islington.gov.uk/NorthgatePublicDocs/00330877.pdf

125889763 over 3 years ago

Tricky tagging. It's actually a small pop-up-gallery space and venue-for-hire. Not the *best* place for tourists to head to expecting an art gallery.

123407148 over 3 years ago

We need to show the newly named Navigator Square. I've just merged the two pedestrian areas which previously carried names Holloway Road and Archway Close.
I see Crudough now show their address as Navigator Square rather not Archway Close (same number), so I guess Archway Close doesn't exist any more

121497899 over 3 years ago

Excellent points both! Wow strava is amazing for this kind of thing https://twitter.com/harry_wood/status/1529823116657995777 (all fixed)

119045425 over 3 years ago

Yeah I can't work out what this place is. No signage apart from a phone number. For a reception/office I presume. It might be an old folks home or something like that. It looks mostly residential with very pronounced wheelchair ramp outside.
Maybe I should ring the number and ask!

108386172 almost 4 years ago

Fixes note note/1687698#map=19/51.53511/-0.10933 Thanks!

43846980 almost 4 years ago

I see this here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.518244802984&lng=-0.16328142097638&z=17&pKey=123690763472939&focus=photo&x=0.4997317356275081&y=0.5788274828468936&zoom=0

I'm trying to work out why the tag for this is bicycle_parking=anchors (and what that tag is even for) . To me these look like standard bicycle_parking=stands . See this discussion: osm.wiki/Talk:Key:bicycle_parking#is_anchors_type_real.3F

34553908 almost 4 years ago

With this changset you mapped some bicycle_parking with the tag bicycle_parking=anchors . I'm trying to work out what this tag really means (Me and few other people: osm.wiki/Talk:Key:bicycle_parking#is_anchors_type_real.3F ) So take this node for example: node/3781068773 I can see it in the street here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.506418&lng=-0.23214659&z=17&pKey=757957804892400&focus=photo Isn't that just a "stand"? Why is that bicycle_parking=anchors?

116868724 almost 4 years ago

eek! https://twitter.com/RealHankWolfman/status/1489512307793272834 . Thanks for fixing. Hopefully it will re-render soon.

111930497 about 4 years ago

Are these the toilets inside the pub? (level=1)

110983158 over 4 years ago

This is deleting data added in this original changeset: changeset/78334047

Some more discussion here on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/pkyrjq/uh_is_this_a_joke/

35072149 over 4 years ago

This is a six year old edit to a short section of Crouch Hill, adding embankment=yes, oneway=yes and changing the road ref. All incorrect.

We might assume it was three different mistakes by this new user... however I see the changeset comment also has a spammy looking message. Anyway I just reverted the last of these tagging errors now changeset/110396789

110396516 over 4 years ago

I put it as shop=art because I see some art on display in the window, but looks kind of vacant (maybe never open as a shop)
Looks like the tourist info functions were merged with the nearby library, but I didn't tag that yet.
All needs a bit more survey/investigation

109468394 over 4 years ago

So at least it'll be consistent within this station, but...
perhaps the correct thing to do is to delete all the "name" tags from platforms. Other stations have only 'ref'. It's a shame Transport Map is only rendering the name tag.

108174817 over 4 years ago

Yeah exactly. I've got to tick off those N19 ones. Shame on me. Actually I've recently done a few which were *very* close to my house, but still... need to be turning it green!

108174817 over 4 years ago

Nice one philiprowlands. I've been neglecting post box mapping. I should do a bit more in my area just to the south of here

71543826 over 4 years ago

I was able to swap the tags from "proposed" for a section of this just now. See changeset/105025076

103259787 over 4 years ago

Thanks for fixing that road naming mistake! (Review: That all looks fine)

And congrats on your first OSM edit puntofisso!